I don't mean to doom, but the judge in this case looks to be corrupt. How can we be confident that such evidence will be ruled as admissible? Is there some legal doctrine that will force the judge's hand?
I don't think you realize how weak this case is. Smith is claiming Trump KNEW the Election was not stolen. This opens Discovery for Trump to use all evidence refuting that claim from the prosecution.
If she attempts to prevent all that evidence in Discovery she exposes the entire trial as a fraud, with her as the conductor.
I don't mean to doom, but the judge in this case looks to be corrupt. How can we be confident that such evidence will be ruled as admissible? Is there some legal doctrine that will force the judge's hand?
I don't think you realize how weak this case is. Smith is claiming Trump KNEW the Election was not stolen. This opens Discovery for Trump to use all evidence refuting that claim from the prosecution.
If she attempts to prevent all that evidence in Discovery she exposes the entire trial as a fraud, with her as the conductor.
So be it. Military is the only way.
Doesnt even matter. Any shenanigans and this will end up at the supreme court anyway