Uuuummmmm exuse me WHAT?!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
Can anyone lay out specifically why they are apprehensive about this? I agree that this is unsettling, but I can't articulate exactly why.
OK "SunShine" ! Here we go . . . More "Big Govt" / more control / more intrusion into our lives / more manipulation of the monetary system / more corruption / more theft / more inflation / more MORON glowie's such as yourself. Obvious troll right here.
Thanks for the uncalled for insult without any specific answers as to HOW biometric purchasing increases any of those bad things. Stop trolling.
Lighten up, Francis.
It's another ID capture device. And morons will willingly step up to use it because "it's so COOL!!!".
You want to be tracked and have every single purchase you make recorded in some gubment database? Be my guest.
They already track my purchases through my credit card.
Then don’t use a credit card dumbass! Use cash!
Of course, that's always an option. (Unless they go full cashless, that would be a serious problem.)
But you could say the same thing about this palm scanner. Don't use it dumbass, just use cash!
So what makes the palm scanner worse than a credit card?
I think some of it is because of the 'mark of the beast' that's mentioned in the book of Revelation. In my opinion this isn't it, but will be seen as another step in that direction.
For me though, no business needs to uniquely identify me or scan the inside of my body in order to sell me their crap, and they have no business asking.
If I can pay by letting them scan and map what's inside of my body, maybe they'd let me shop there by scanning and mapping the inside of their corporate offices?
I don't believe a palm vein scan matches any of the passages in scripture which describe the mark of the beast.
And what power would a corporation gain over you by scanning your palm? More tracking data, sure. But we are already HEAVILY tracked through our cell phones, credit card purchases, ubiquitous CCTV cameras, etc. And those things all seem far more intrusive upon our privacy than a palm scan at the grocery store.
Well then step right up and get yours. It's just a mask, right?
Biometrics are part of the digital identity necessary for the great reset. But we don't need to worry about using them to vote, because they don't plan to hold any elections.
shouldn't be any different than paying by facial recognition, except facial data can be recognized by a human whereas fingerprints and vein patterns are a little more 'encrypted', like you don't just see a fingerprint and say hey look its jim.
basically this means amazon is building a database of what your veins look like for identification
How is this any worse than the fingerprint scanner I use to unlock my cell phone?
Btw, a perfectly acceptable answer would be "they are both bad, and you shouldn't be giving away any of your biometric data so easily." But can you articulate why?
its about who you trust with your data, i guess. its perfectly possible for a fingerprint scanner to only store data locally and not share it with anyone. I think that's probably the case by default with most phones, although i'm guessing backdoors exist so they can retrieve your print if they needed to.
However, when you use amazon's, there is no presumption of privacy. you are just donating your biometrics to an international database.
I assume none of the data I enter into any digital internet connected device is private.
Ultimately, they will sell you convenience to get you reliant on it so that their next scam seems less intrusive than it is.