I get it that gold is insurance against inflation. And, it's real money in an economic catastrophe.
My question is on behalf of the Anons who may have purchased some gold coins (but lost them in the lake). If we paid $1000 for one 1oz coin, and the US goes back to a gold-backed standard and values gold at $35/oz., that is quite a loss! I am not that is what will happen, but I present that scenario as part of the broader question: What would gold need to be valued at in our fiat US$ currency in order to be the backing?
Any Anons have a sense for the future value of a gold coin in the gold-backed dollar scenario? A lot of people have purchased gold coins hoping that they will revalue north of $20K or $50K to accommodate all of the fiat floating around. But I just can't see the elites letting people get "rich" so easily.
By definition yes, but it's more than that in effect. It is also people's savings. While this "savings" is not a real asset, people currently believe that it is. That belief is important in how people will react. It is also the effective measure of a persons work. It is the measure of the trading value of other real assets. In order to transition without war, or mass suicide, or mass murder, you can't create a system that effectively takes assets from people, or otherwise make it so that those who hold other assets (such as gold) gain so much buying power that the entire economy collapses, by in effect transferring huge amounts of assets, real or imagined, to those few people.
Yes, but the transition needs to be done in a measured fashion or again, the drastic change in assets would cause war (Civil and world wide).
It is entirely possible that people will be given a choice as you suggest, but it must be something that everyone knows about and is available to everyone, with enough time to make a transition that the vast majority of people will accept and not feel screwed. It can't be something like, "Surprise! Everyone who owns a few ounces of gold are economic gods, and everyone else is fucked!"
Everyone has been doing those things because the real enemy employs mind control techniques to ensure that happens. Yes, they could "choose" to break free, and some have. They created other mind control techniques to ensure that those people are called "conspiracy theorists" (a term they created for that purpose). Blaming people for being asleep is not the path. It's like blaming people for being slaves. Yes, they could choose to not be slaves, but unless there is a clear opportunity to a choice other than death for them and their family for not being a slave, most will choose slavery. That is where we are, and where we have been for a very long time.
The proletariat doesn't break out the torches and pitch forks until the Real Rulers, who control all the information and manipulate everyone behind the scenes (including the people we think of as "rulers"), tell them to. The world has been controlled by crisis actors and other forms of controlled opposition for thousands of years.
No matter where I look, I can find no act of violence that was not instigated and run by the enemy themselves. All Wars are Banker Wars isn't just for the 20th century. My research suggests it applies going all the way back to at least the Crusades, and likely the early Roman Empire, with the possible exception being the misnamed "Mongolian invasion," and other Scythian incursions into Europe and the Middle East. Even those ones I'm not sure because there are ties between the Scythians and the current ruling class.
It has to happen to some extent, but if "The Plan" is truly designed to Awaken, and not Destroy, it will happen in the way that incurs the least losses, thus I don't think "drastic" will be as drastic as it would be if the plan was the Cabal Plan.
For example, in every communist takeover, The Plan was to create massive starvation and the violent murder of any and all dissenters to "the solution," along with their planned economic collapse. In China for example, the 1950s killed upwards of 100 Million people in their Communist takeover. This showed the people who survived the power of the government, creating both a fear in some, for non-compliance and a belief in a savior state in others, depending on which propaganda they bought in to. Basically the exact same thing happened in Russia, Korea, etc.
It's gotta hurt before it can heal. But if it kills you, it's probably not really "a cure". I really don't think it will be that bad. It will be "just bad enough" to motivate the vast majority to accept a change.
We've all been ridiculed trying to help the sleepers awaken, or even just try to live our lives with our knowledge. It is hard to not take it personally when the attacks are personal. Appreciating that the personal attacks are part of their brainwashing helps to not worry so much about it. They will either wake up and live a more fulfilled life, or they won't. Be happy for them if they do, pity them if they never do.
I'm not sure. What I consider the "Major plays" have been done through the stock markets, having nothing to do with energy. The first really big one was the 1907 panic, which motivated the creation of the Federal Reserve. That was about copper stocks. The next one was the Stock Market crash of 1929. That was all about stocks again. I mean, really it was all about reducing the money supply after they had been pumping it out like there was no tomorrow for WWI and a few years afterwards (exactly as is happening now), but the axe came down through the stock market. This of course set us up to become a partially communist country, along with numerous other downstream effects (all planned) including the rise of Hitler and WWII, leading to the United Nations (one world government), the creation of the state of Israel, etc.
The point is, I think the Stock Market will be the instigator. I do think it is entirely possible that it will tie into energy and BRICS afterwards though.
I think that's exactly what a good number of people here believe, based on conversations I've read.
You're ruining some perfectly good pipe dreams, you know.
I do think it will likely provide an economic advantage. I just really don't think "The Plan" is to make people want to kill themselves.
Unless "suicide weekend" was intended to mean all the newly destitute people.
At that point I'd have to seriously question the Q objective.
There is a very vocal contingent here who are expecting/hoping for a huge upheaval of the social order. They're not shy about telling everyone that they want normies to suffer. A lot. Some are positively gleeful about it. And then they start talking about how great they will have it, because they bought a few ounces of gold here and there.
Somewhere along the way they lost the plot, I think. Because actively working to cause normal, everyday people to suffer and die while counting your money is definitely something you'd think the deep state would do. Not those who are supposedly opposed to such things.
Somehow those people forgot about all that, in favor of fantasizing about how everyone who mocked them would suffer and regret it, and how they would suddenly become wealthy.