Its hard to imagine people who have spent a ton of time here on the front lines of an information war, that have trouble recognizing that misinformation, misdirection and counter ops are necessary to keep a well entrenched enemy off balance.
This is why I have preached here for two years not to get invested in any one person, to not place all your hopes into any one narrative but to remain flexible in your thinking and determinations so that you can shift on the fly as future proves past. We are in the midst of a 5th gen psychological war and coming to conclusions based on open source information which may or may not be factual is playing into the enemies hands.
Im not worried about the ripcord stuff for two reasons. First, disinformation and keeping your enemy of balance is important. Second, we dont have all the information and we dont know what counter plays the enemy had in store.
Lindells packet information didnt come out and we later find out that if they had his symposium was to be raided and so a last second decision was made to nix that part. There could be a similar scenario at play. And as weve seen this would have only furthered disclosure, nothing concrete would have come of it because the courts, DoJ and LE are corrupt to the core. You arent getting anything done legally until the final reveal.
One big thing in his favor is Trump loves what he has done. That too could be Sun Tzu shit.
But Greg is in the same bag as everyone not named Trump for me. I will wait until the big reveal to judge because at this point in time my opinion on the details doesnt mean jack squat to the Plans success or failure. When I attempt to red pill I use facts and leave personalities out of it completely. Mentioning any of the players allows bias and emotion to overrule logic.
Well said. I am never certain with anything, and constantly shifting perspectives. The ONE thing I do know, is that I have no clue who is playing a role, and who isnât. Maybe we shouldnât be so certain in all of our judgements, but instead, present them as a current theory
I would love to be wrong, but Gregg appears to me to be a âwords onlyâ guy.
That is not true at all. In fact, Greg and Katherine went to jail over the information they released.
What did Q tell us from nearly the beginning? That "we" have it all and the timing would be up to the President (DJT).
What did Jan Halper say recently, that DJT and Flynn endorsed? That they have it all and the timing of the release of it was at the discretion of DJT.
So if Gregg got ahead of the plan with some clever investigating ("mules") and was going to release it all (aka RIPCORD)... One could see how DJT would step in say... "not yet fren. Not until we see the precipice." ...and then publicly truth out to "save the data for later", which happened.
The biggest criticism I can give him, is it took much longer to get open.ink up and running than he said it would. So I guess don't hire him as a software project management?
If Gregg is the real deal, itâs another huge nail in the DS coffin, why would I not want that?
Im cautiously optimistic following the great awakening, but Iâm also well aware of poison pills, and my gut feeling regarding Gregg is telling me somethingâs off about him.
Being a blind believer is not what Q has taught me, and the amount of datefagging by Gregg and his team has left me with a bad taste in my mouth.
But again, Iâd love to be wrong, and I mean that most sincerely.
I don't want you to be a blind believer either. But you also cannot be paralyzed by fear of being wrong (poison pills and counter-ops).
Gregg has delivered most of what he promised, if often late. His biggest promise, the mule data, we can clearly see now would go against the timeline that DJT set. And we know he is in control of the timeline from multiple sources.
That is why I believe your ego is forcing you to hope to be right. Most of your arguments have fallen through and yet you refuse to reconsider your position.
By all means, go where your heart and mind take you. But me looking on you from the outside, sees you being a little rigid in a sea of changing facts.
I never doubted Gregg. He always had a look on his face that screamed "I know everything, WE know everything, and they're going to pay for it dearly SOON."
I member when they called Gregg a larp and a grifter...
Oh, how the tables are turning
People here did.
Yes they fuking did. That irritated the shit out of me. Attacked Sidney Powell too. Aight doomers ⌠you will see.
I was one of them, Gregg has delivered zero on his promise of the âripcordâ almost 150 ânext Mondaysâ ago.
I would love to be wrong, but Gregg appears to me to be a âwords onlyâ guy.
I would love to be wrong.
Its hard to imagine people who have spent a ton of time here on the front lines of an information war, that have trouble recognizing that misinformation, misdirection and counter ops are necessary to keep a well entrenched enemy off balance.
This is why I have preached here for two years not to get invested in any one person, to not place all your hopes into any one narrative but to remain flexible in your thinking and determinations so that you can shift on the fly as future proves past. We are in the midst of a 5th gen psychological war and coming to conclusions based on open source information which may or may not be factual is playing into the enemies hands.
Exactly. Itâs very important to not entrench oneself in a certain agenda or theory.
Iâm 100% certain that black hats are using the same tactics as we do when it comes to operatives and pay ops.
Whatâs going on with Gregg, Iâm not too sure.
One huge point in favour is the newspaper from the infamous AF1 picture, with âTrue the voteâ scribbled on it.
A huge negative is the failed delivery of the rip chord and the Telegram spectacle.
Iâm still on the cautious side regarding Gregg.
Im not worried about the ripcord stuff for two reasons. First, disinformation and keeping your enemy of balance is important. Second, we dont have all the information and we dont know what counter plays the enemy had in store.
Lindells packet information didnt come out and we later find out that if they had his symposium was to be raided and so a last second decision was made to nix that part. There could be a similar scenario at play. And as weve seen this would have only furthered disclosure, nothing concrete would have come of it because the courts, DoJ and LE are corrupt to the core. You arent getting anything done legally until the final reveal.
One big thing in his favor is Trump loves what he has done. That too could be Sun Tzu shit.
But Greg is in the same bag as everyone not named Trump for me. I will wait until the big reveal to judge because at this point in time my opinion on the details doesnt mean jack squat to the Plans success or failure. When I attempt to red pill I use facts and leave personalities out of it completely. Mentioning any of the players allows bias and emotion to overrule logic.
Preach!
But every phrase Jean Halper-Hayes said last week is now gospel. /s
Q told us that disinformation is necessary. Sometimes fooling us into furthering a false narrative may force our enemies hand.
Well said. I am never certain with anything, and constantly shifting perspectives. The ONE thing I do know, is that I have no clue who is playing a role, and who isnât. Maybe we shouldnât be so certain in all of our judgements, but instead, present them as a current theory
Me too, but it could be that Gregg was an independent operator who had to be told by the WH to cool it because the timeline wasn't ready. We will see.
That is not true at all. In fact, Greg and Katherine went to jail over the information they released.
What did Q tell us from nearly the beginning? That "we" have it all and the timing would be up to the President (DJT).
What did Jan Halper say recently, that DJT and Flynn endorsed? That they have it all and the timing of the release of it was at the discretion of DJT.
So if Gregg got ahead of the plan with some clever investigating ("mules") and was going to release it all (aka RIPCORD)... One could see how DJT would step in say... "not yet fren. Not until we see the precipice." ...and then publicly truth out to "save the data for later", which happened.
The biggest criticism I can give him, is it took much longer to get open.ink up and running than he said it would. So I guess don't hire him as a software project management?
Ron Burgundy: "I don't believe you."
Off curse I would love to be wrong.
If Gregg is the real deal, itâs another huge nail in the DS coffin, why would I not want that?
Im cautiously optimistic following the great awakening, but Iâm also well aware of poison pills, and my gut feeling regarding Gregg is telling me somethingâs off about him.
Being a blind believer is not what Q has taught me, and the amount of datefagging by Gregg and his team has left me with a bad taste in my mouth.
But again, Iâd love to be wrong, and I mean that most sincerely.
I don't want you to be a blind believer either. But you also cannot be paralyzed by fear of being wrong (poison pills and counter-ops).
Gregg has delivered most of what he promised, if often late. His biggest promise, the mule data, we can clearly see now would go against the timeline that DJT set. And we know he is in control of the timeline from multiple sources.
That is why I believe your ego is forcing you to hope to be right. Most of your arguments have fallen through and yet you refuse to reconsider your position.
By all means, go where your heart and mind take you. But me looking on you from the outside, sees you being a little rigid in a sea of changing facts.
This isnt a bad read on the situation.
Future proves past.
I never doubted Gregg. He always had a look on his face that screamed "I know everything, WE know everything, and they're going to pay for it dearly SOON."