So the basic idea is this. In 1870 and 1871, congress created a corporation to administer DC, and outsourced the functions of government to it, essentially copying the constitution as a set of corporate bylaws overlaid over the original constitution. Gradually the government functions were transferred from the original authority of the states and to the outsourced corporation which had been established in England to operate in DC, and this process was accelerated with the creation of the federal reserve.
Here are the two best summaries I have read to describe how it occurred. Both have links to actual congressional records, placed in context with explanations. It's reading that requires attention, but we'll worth it if you want to dig.
First is teamlaw: http://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm#dcoa1871
Second is Anna Von Reitz: https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2021/01/16/misinformation-about-the-act-of-1871-is-an-ongoing-problem-part-2/
I personally think Trump is reconstituting the Old Republic even while he simultaneously devolved the Corp. as described by the first few entries in Patel Patriot's devolution series (https://www.devolution.link/), and that the upcoming financial crash will end up with any of the Corp's assets (like the military contracts and gear, national parks, territories, and of course DC itself) being transferred back to the Old Republic. I don't actually know that's what he's doing, but devolution is extremely well documented, and it seems to dovetail well with the impending bankruptcy of the federal reserve. And there were a number of interesting meetings between Trump and state legislators (no other president that I know of has reached out to state assembly members that I can remember) that I heard about in the news between Nov 2020 and Jan 2021.
Anyway, after a comment in a different post, I thought it was worth posting some of the more readable links regarding the whole "what's up with the 1871 Corp?" topic.
If anybody has real info on those meetings with state assemblies, and I don't mean the Rudy Giuliani & Jenna Ellis presentations but rather the Trump - state legislator direct meetings that I only heard about, I'd be interested. I'll be offline for a bit but will check the thread later. Cheers.
Yes but gotta be mindful when researching this topic. They play very fast and loose with language and word origins.
E.g., the word "doc", meaning the person who delivers you, has nothing to do with a boat "dock".
The word "birth" is unrelated to "berth", meaning a ship's allotted place at a wharf or dock.
The trip about capitalization arises from an arbitrary mistranslation of the Latin phrase capitis diminutio—meaning a diminishing, abridgment, loss or curtailment of a man's status or legal CAPACITY—as the diminishing of status through the use of "CAPITALIZATION" of letters in his name! The Latin phrase has to do with CAPACITY, not CAPITALIZATION of letters.
Errors like this occur liberally throughout descriptions that portray everything as maritime.
Considering that Trump has been shouting about a WITCH HUNT for years, and witches “cast spells”, those things can’t be discarded. If you want to say they aren’t proof, though, you’re correct.
That said, we are gonna stuff their plausible deniabilities with so many stacks upon stacks of coincidences they’re forced to toss their collective word salads all over the walls of BabbleOn.