I still see FAR more reason to believe this is the case than it isn't.
Even if only a dozen people knew that it was happening (hint hint), it would still be legally valid.
I watch the Devolution Power Hour all the time but they seem way too dismissive of this. The President Trump retruth seems too easily dismissed and the skeptics overall seem to treat Trump like he just scattershot retruths whatever he feels like without rhyme or reason, or that he would retruth this to highlight Election Fraud but that we should ignore everything else she says.
But I don’t think President Trump is scattershot in his messaging at all. If the whole story of USA Inc. is bullshit, and he would know, why would he lead so many of his supporters astray? What - he couldn’t find a different video about Election Fraud that DIDN’T contain the Vatican gold and USA Inc. stuff? That doesn’t seem believable to me.
Sure, President Trump’s retruth isn’t definitive proof in and of itself, but it’s a big hint of what direction he wants the narrative to go. Flynn then reposting the video is further confirmation. Of course it’s the same situation as with Q, where they always leave that little bit of plausible deniability for the people who need to keep believing in the status quo.
To me this whole retruth suggests that this is where things are headed, but that they aren’t ready to definitively state it yet, so the idea is first being deployed amongst the anons to prepare the mainstream.
I agree, they are way too dismissive.He thanked Trump Jr for it meaning they both signed off on not needing any distancing from the obvious appearance that everyone has taken it for. Him signing off on something to the effect of what she said, and it wasn't the election everyone took note of. For a master of narrative steering Trump sure got blindsided lol. It's like seeing the effects of the wind but guruism has them denying it.
Another thing is that if these theories are so crazy, shouldn’t the corporate media be using this to attack him? It should be a lay up, right? Or have they been instructed to back off on this one?
For sure, it's in such a weird spot, when you view the way everyone is handling those details. It's truly the elephant in the room suddenly, and for a whole crowd of folks so focused on finally addressing the elephants in the room all the time. It's out of character. Or it's in character I can't decide lol
Also, this video by Sergeant Robert Horton fills in more of the possible history of what has been going on. It’s up to each person to decide how credible this sounds, and I admit parts of it do sound fantastic, but overall this makes quite a bit of sense to me, and the vibe I get from this guy is not that he is a liar or a grifter. Even the idea that someone made this all up seems like a stretch. It’s too weirdly detailed and doesn’t fit with the structure of normal lies.
Sergeant Horton had some interesting info but really is there any sauce? Are there any links to the two guys he references? Are there any docs regarding the 1999 missed bankruptcy payment?
I’m not sure what kind of sauce we exactly expect to find, given this is hidden history stuff. I have also watched a few hours of interviews with this Gould fellow to learn about his quantum grammar system. It’s fairly interesting stuff - I think the series is called War Castles and is on Rumble - but he makes some wild claims that would be hard to verify. The idea of a new grammar for legal documents that prevents errors in double meanings of words and subjective interpretation, that has to work both backwards and forwards, is definitely intriguing.
It's only about what you can prove. Follow the breadcrumbs. Do we have some? Yes. What do they point to? Devolution. That's the framework, as far as we can see it.
And what we're seeing these days is that today's "That's outrageous, no way can this be true" almost always evolve into, "I knew it the whole time, tried to tell people but they wouldn't listen".
I still see FAR more reason to believe this is the case than it isn't.
Even if only a dozen people knew that it was happening (hint hint), it would still be legally valid.
I watch the Devolution Power Hour all the time but they seem way too dismissive of this. The President Trump retruth seems too easily dismissed and the skeptics overall seem to treat Trump like he just scattershot retruths whatever he feels like without rhyme or reason, or that he would retruth this to highlight Election Fraud but that we should ignore everything else she says.
But I don’t think President Trump is scattershot in his messaging at all. If the whole story of USA Inc. is bullshit, and he would know, why would he lead so many of his supporters astray? What - he couldn’t find a different video about Election Fraud that DIDN’T contain the Vatican gold and USA Inc. stuff? That doesn’t seem believable to me.
Sure, President Trump’s retruth isn’t definitive proof in and of itself, but it’s a big hint of what direction he wants the narrative to go. Flynn then reposting the video is further confirmation. Of course it’s the same situation as with Q, where they always leave that little bit of plausible deniability for the people who need to keep believing in the status quo.
To me this whole retruth suggests that this is where things are headed, but that they aren’t ready to definitively state it yet, so the idea is first being deployed amongst the anons to prepare the mainstream.
I agree, they are way too dismissive.He thanked Trump Jr for it meaning they both signed off on not needing any distancing from the obvious appearance that everyone has taken it for. Him signing off on something to the effect of what she said, and it wasn't the election everyone took note of. For a master of narrative steering Trump sure got blindsided lol. It's like seeing the effects of the wind but guruism has them denying it.
Another thing is that if these theories are so crazy, shouldn’t the corporate media be using this to attack him? It should be a lay up, right? Or have they been instructed to back off on this one?
For sure, it's in such a weird spot, when you view the way everyone is handling those details. It's truly the elephant in the room suddenly, and for a whole crowd of folks so focused on finally addressing the elephants in the room all the time. It's out of character. Or it's in character I can't decide lol
They even talk about satanic pedofiles that drink kids blood for the adrenochrome....but never hint at Devolution or Peads or CIC.
Also, this video by Sergeant Robert Horton fills in more of the possible history of what has been going on. It’s up to each person to decide how credible this sounds, and I admit parts of it do sound fantastic, but overall this makes quite a bit of sense to me, and the vibe I get from this guy is not that he is a liar or a grifter. Even the idea that someone made this all up seems like a stretch. It’s too weirdly detailed and doesn’t fit with the structure of normal lies.
https://rumble.com/v1203f0-sergeant-robert-horton-war-castles-overview.html
Sergeant Horton had some interesting info but really is there any sauce? Are there any links to the two guys he references? Are there any docs regarding the 1999 missed bankruptcy payment?
Have you found any?
I’m not sure what kind of sauce we exactly expect to find, given this is hidden history stuff. I have also watched a few hours of interviews with this Gould fellow to learn about his quantum grammar system. It’s fairly interesting stuff - I think the series is called War Castles and is on Rumble - but he makes some wild claims that would be hard to verify. The idea of a new grammar for legal documents that prevents errors in double meanings of words and subjective interpretation, that has to work both backwards and forwards, is definitely intriguing.
It's only about what you can prove. Follow the breadcrumbs. Do we have some? Yes. What do they point to? Devolution. That's the framework, as far as we can see it.
And what we're seeing these days is that today's "That's outrageous, no way can this be true" almost always evolve into, "I knew it the whole time, tried to tell people but they wouldn't listen".