It was more like the prosecutors won some and Trump's team won some.
She agreed to a protective order. This article is flat wrong that she did not issue a protective order.
She took issue with how broad the protective order should be. She did not all agree that all discovery materials should be protected, but quite a lot will be.
I'll probably make a post on this. I don't think the Trump Team got very much, there were a lot of restrictions.
Pretty much what I was going to say. Both sides asked for more than what they wanted with the expectation to lose some battles.
For example the judge wasn't going to ask the doj to individually classify 11.7m pages as sensitive or not, per Trump's team's request, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
It was more like the prosecutors won some and Trump's team won some.
She agreed to a protective order. This article is flat wrong that she did not issue a protective order.
She took issue with how broad the protective order should be. She did not all agree that all discovery materials should be protected, but quite a lot will be.
I'll probably make a post on this. I don't think the Trump Team got very much, there were a lot of restrictions.
EDIT: Here's the post.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c246eK7J/trumps-jan-6th-protective-order-/
I concur. Here is an important take on the decision.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/developing-obama-judge-tanya-chutkan-gag-trump/
This article is wrong. This not a gag order. A gag order is more restrictive
A gag order still could come.
Pretty much what I was going to say. Both sides asked for more than what they wanted with the expectation to lose some battles.
For example the judge wasn't going to ask the doj to individually classify 11.7m pages as sensitive or not, per Trump's team's request, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
I just did a post on this from what I saw on twitter.
The full articles are starting to come out.