Rubber ignites at 600-700 degrees, but burns much, much hotter ( over 2000 degrees )
https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/tire-depot-fire-could-burn-for-several-days_20160512151138618
DEW is a PSYOP to distract, divide and confuse and worst of all, ignore the murder of hundreds of people and the destruction of our beautiful country.
Occam's Razor >> It's ARSON
Accompanying Post:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c28hdaRU/paradise-lost-again--maui-fire-a/
Direct Energy weapons exist. They were first deployed in the military in 2014. You can bet when we hear about technology the DOD has they are already 50 years ahead of what they tell us. Whether they have been used to start fires doesn't really matter, but they do exist:
https://news.usni.org/2022/09/14/report-to-congress-on-defense-department-directed-energy-weapons
They were used even earlier in Iraq, and 9/11. If you haven't seen Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go" presentation, it's a doozy
Then why did the towers do the pancake sequence characteristic of timed implosion charges with the explosions coming from within the buildings on each floor in turn?
Why did paper survive the collapse yet all of the concrete was turned into dust? How were the firerfighters on the second floor able to survive that many floors coming down on them if it was purely controlled explosions? Why were all of the cars in the area singed and completely melted through, any of the ones that touched the dust? Why didn't the building register on the richter scale appropriately (that much mass would've generated a larger event)? What was going on with the geomagnetic field right up to and after the event?
All of the concrete was turned to dust? So what was the debris that they spent months removing then if the concrete was dust and just blown away? The blast wave can also push the papers out ahead of it.
And they don't use them to start fires. That's why we have matches, gasoline, and napalm. The first experimental weapon-class lasers were operating 50 years ago, but they were no secret. The only reason you didn't hear about it sooner was that you weren't paying attention.
This is the kind of comment that is typical of GAW's low-effort crowd. "Directed energy weapons exist" and then "SOURCE" (PDF everyone has to read).
Researchers are very familiar with this report. Here is a summary of this report (not the "Limitations" section):
Directed energy weapons use concentrated electromagnetic energy rather than kinetic energy to incapacitate targets. The two main types are high-energy lasers (HELs) and high-powered microwaves (HPMs).
HELs emit a precise laser beam that can heat up and damage targets. They can engage aerial targets like drones and missiles, and surface targets like boats. HPMs emit wide beams of microwave radiation to disrupt electronics.
Battlespace: DE weapons have line-of-sight limitations and are impacted by weather and atmospheric conditions. HELs work best at shorter ranges under clear conditions. HPMs can cover wider areas but shorter ranges than HELs.
Targets: Potential targets include enemy sensors, communications, drones, missiles, artillery, vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft. At close range they may be able to damage ground targets, but long-range ground attack is difficult. How they work: HELs focus a high-energy laser beam on a target, heating it up to damage or destroy it. HPMs bombard targets with high-powered microwave beams that overload and fry electronics.
Advantages: Precise, low cost per shot, deep magazines if sufficient power, gradual effects from warning to destroying targets.
Limitations: Range and effectiveness limited by line-of-sight, weather conditions, beam diffraction over distance. Large power and cooling needs restrict mobility.
In summary, DE weapons utilize directed energy rather than kinetics, with each type having strengths against certain targets, especially at shorter ranges. Their limitations prevent long-range ground attack but they offer counter-air/missile/drone capabilities.
I would argue it is just as low effort to suggest that it was plain arson. I agree that just saying it's space lasers is silly. However, to classify all directed energy weapons as space lasers, is also silly.
It's worth it to have a discussion about all types of energy weaponry, not just "muh space lasers," such weapons could be used to detonate even disconnected transformers, cause battery fires, overcharge the magnetrons in microwaves, blow fuses, etc. All possible origins of fire
As I said in another response to a comment of yours, the resulting effect and the planned "reconstruction" effort is of more interest to most. Which is fine. But allowing more people to learn and discuss these types of weapons will open our eyes to the other ways they can be used around the world
This is an interesting find for anons who are more open minded:
https://afresearchlab.com/technology/air-force-maui-optical-and-supercomputing-amos-site/
“The AFRL Directed Energy Directorate operates two major telescope sites that are used to advance SSA technologies. One of these sites is located on Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, and the other site is located on Maui, Hawaii. The Maui site is called the Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) site.”
huh, very interesting find...
I honestly thought everyone on GAW could read. Sorry, I should have made a 2 hour video explaining it to the illiterates.
And it's still cheaper to send some trantifa to go light some fires in the woods.
Again, on target.
Interesting, but look at what is on Maui Island too:
https://afresearchlab.com/technology/air-force-maui-optical-and-supercomputing-amos-site/
“The AFRL Directed Energy Directorate operates two major telescope sites that are used to advance SSA technologies. One of these sites is located on Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, and the other site is located on Maui, Hawaii. The Maui site is called the Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) site.”