Plenty of people have come forward with claims of eye witness knowledge of election fraud.
And they have signed affidavits, under oath.
BUT ...
Those affidavits and those claims are not "officially" testimony UNTIL the person testifies under oath ... IN COURT.
The judges have refused to allow that to happen.
So technically, there is no evidence presented. But that is ONLY because corrupt judges refuse to allow the process to unfold so that it CAN be presented, under the Rules of Evidence.
Correct.
Plenty of people have come forward with claims of eye witness knowledge of election fraud.
And they have signed affidavits, under oath.
BUT ...
Those affidavits and those claims are not "officially" testimony UNTIL the person testifies under oath ... IN COURT.
The judges have refused to allow that to happen.
So technically, there is no evidence presented. But that is ONLY because corrupt judges refuse to allow the process to unfold so that it CAN be presented, under the Rules of Evidence.
Kemp knows this, no doubt.
He is a DS puppet.
Damn... did not know.... That is significant.....