I mean energy consumption depends on the scale of the system.
In theory. You wouldn’t need a continuous source of energy. Or a large scale system. Short bursts and knowledge of how something burns would be sufficient. If you apply aforementioned knowledge correctly.
Rubber for instance is a bitch to put out once it’s started burning. Setting a junkyard or somewhere that has a large supply of tires or rubber products. Would ensure a blaze that burns for a long time.
Point being they could probably get by with drawing on the public power grid for short bursts and not attract to much notice. Rather then some convoluted method of using the energy of storms.
We had a fire close to town. It burned about a half an acre before extinguishing. The tree leaves were scorched brown. They would have burned quickly if the fire dept hadn’t put it out quickly.
There's absolutely no evidence that these DEWs are orbiting and able to burn the ground with precision. Fun fact: even with the physics of lasers, a tightly focused beam will inevitably spread due to quantum effects. This divergence is largely influenced by the wavelength of the laser and the aperture size. Furthermore, atmospheric interference, especially over long distances, can scatter and attenuate laser beams. Additionally, maintaining a stable platform in orbit to ensure pinpoint accuracy is a significant engineering challenge.
Let's review. Soooo... somewhere in space there's a platform that can dustify the WTC. It was used that day, but hasn't been used anywhere again, it's not getting used to support Ukraine, it's not vapourizing terrorists or unfriendlies in Syria or Iran... it's just nonsense.
Anyone got the patents for the DEW's that start fires? No?
Leaving this up, but, THIS low-effort nonsense is why mods remove these posts.
Have a look....
https://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm
https://mathscholar.org/2019/03/lenr-energy-science-or-pseudoscience/
https://web.archive.org/web/20211228082318/https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_newenergy.htm
Bet you could do it with leds that emit frequencies that cause friction.
The photos that I saw of melted metal were clearly aluminium. I have made wood fires for cooking and accidentally melted aluminium baking pans.
I mean energy consumption depends on the scale of the system.
In theory. You wouldn’t need a continuous source of energy. Or a large scale system. Short bursts and knowledge of how something burns would be sufficient. If you apply aforementioned knowledge correctly.
Rubber for instance is a bitch to put out once it’s started burning. Setting a junkyard or somewhere that has a large supply of tires or rubber products. Would ensure a blaze that burns for a long time.
Point being they could probably get by with drawing on the public power grid for short bursts and not attract to much notice. Rather then some convoluted method of using the energy of storms.
Or focused
We had a fire close to town. It burned about a half an acre before extinguishing. The tree leaves were scorched brown. They would have burned quickly if the fire dept hadn’t put it out quickly.
That whole green trees after the fire bothers me.
There's absolutely no evidence that these DEWs are orbiting and able to burn the ground with precision. Fun fact: even with the physics of lasers, a tightly focused beam will inevitably spread due to quantum effects. This divergence is largely influenced by the wavelength of the laser and the aperture size. Furthermore, atmospheric interference, especially over long distances, can scatter and attenuate laser beams. Additionally, maintaining a stable platform in orbit to ensure pinpoint accuracy is a significant engineering challenge.
Let's review. Soooo... somewhere in space there's a platform that can dustify the WTC. It was used that day, but hasn't been used anywhere again, it's not getting used to support Ukraine, it's not vapourizing terrorists or unfriendlies in Syria or Iran... it's just nonsense.
Anyone got the patents for the DEW's that start fires? No?
Leaving this up, but, THIS low-effort nonsense is why mods remove these posts.
You can't have a DEW mounted on an airplane flying at low altitudes but above the clouds?