razing large areas with lasers without evidence of it happening is not high tech?? And smart meters are very low tech, comparably.
lol ok... bring the proofs, otherwise it's disinformation and/or opinions. You can't just glibly assert that DEW lasers on planes is an easy thing for the Cabal to pull off without adequate evidence.
are Patriots in control or not?
And what about FJB trolling everyone with his 'laser focus' comment?
hey, its your old concern troll 289m. i genuinely haven't seen a take of yours i disagreed with in months. love it.
and i know where you're coming from on this issue. i also know that there was a wave of 'DEW' bullshit after 9-11.
I still believe HAARP was used to start fires before, and then that technology was improved and moved outside the original facility.
HAARP is a ground based transmitter that bounces microwaves off of the whateversphere.
Even as someone who considers the term 'DEW' to be a huge red flag.... I have to admit the possibility that they no longer use ground-based technology to start fires, and that DEW could be correct terminology for whatever they are using.
here's a question: we know they play the long game. and we know they were not subtle about spreading DEW theories back in the day to undermine the credibility of 911 researchers.
could that have served the double purpose of having future pedes dismiss evidence of actual energy weapons? they did choose to use a real term, although actual dew tech was probably much more rudimentary back then.
I don't know. I was on your side on this but now i'm waffling.
It doesn't really matter to me if they used smart meters or DEW. I was just pointing out,that lazzars that hit the ground are not hi tech. For all I know they could have used both. I doubt we will ever see stone cold proof of how they did it, so the argument looks like a waste of time. Looks to me that they burned the people out......
They burned them out and killed hundreds of innocent people.
Mass Murder and crimes against humanity. To be proven, crimes need suspects, motive and forensic evidence of method. It does matter how it happened.
DEW, basement nukes, CGI and other limited hangout pysops and disinformation made sure there was no consensus that understood the controlled demolition at the WTC.
razing large areas with lasers without evidence of it happening is not high tech?? And smart meters are very low tech, comparably.
lol ok... bring the proofs, otherwise it's disinformation and/or opinions. You can't just glibly assert that DEW lasers on planes is an easy thing for the Cabal to pull off without adequate evidence.
are Patriots in control or not?
And what about FJB trolling everyone with his 'laser focus' comment?
40,000 ft view
No simple lazars will do the job and they have around for a long time. And cabal owned companies are the ones who actually make them for the military.
I'm not saying that's what happened, but it's very very possible.
DEW was a psyop to cover controlled demolition of the WTC
Fool me once... ( actually, I knew it was bullshit then, too )
There is a blatant trail of evidence back to the Cabal companies that point to smart meters, not DEW.
Like I said... show the proofs.
hey, its your old concern troll 289m. i genuinely haven't seen a take of yours i disagreed with in months. love it.
and i know where you're coming from on this issue. i also know that there was a wave of 'DEW' bullshit after 9-11.
I still believe HAARP was used to start fires before, and then that technology was improved and moved outside the original facility.
HAARP is a ground based transmitter that bounces microwaves off of the whateversphere.
Even as someone who considers the term 'DEW' to be a huge red flag.... I have to admit the possibility that they no longer use ground-based technology to start fires, and that DEW could be correct terminology for whatever they are using.
here's a question: we know they play the long game. and we know they were not subtle about spreading DEW theories back in the day to undermine the credibility of 911 researchers.
could that have served the double purpose of having future pedes dismiss evidence of actual energy weapons? they did choose to use a real term, although actual dew tech was probably much more rudimentary back then.
I don't know. I was on your side on this but now i'm waffling.
It doesn't really matter to me if they used smart meters or DEW. I was just pointing out,that lazzars that hit the ground are not hi tech. For all I know they could have used both. I doubt we will ever see stone cold proof of how they did it, so the argument looks like a waste of time. Looks to me that they burned the people out......
They burned them out and killed hundreds of innocent people.
Mass Murder and crimes against humanity. To be proven, crimes need suspects, motive and forensic evidence of method. It does matter how it happened.
DEW, basement nukes, CGI and other limited hangout pysops and disinformation made sure there was no consensus that understood the controlled demolition at the WTC.
Narratives matter. Consensus matters.