The plane that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was a Boeing 757, The same type of plane that President Trump flies around in. Here is a series of photos / diagrams to illustrate the official version we got from our government is a lie. There is a mountain of facts like this that exposes their evil.

posted 1 year ago by jhartz39 1 year ago by jhartz39 +54 / -1

Flight 77, the supposed plane that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was a Boeing 757. It is the same plane that President Trump flies in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77#:~:text=The%20aircraft%20involved%20in%20the,Airlines%20on%20May%208%2C%201991.

A Boeing 757 uses one of 2 different engines: Either a Rolls-Royce RB211 or a Pratt & Whitney PW2000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_757#:~:text=The%20jetliner%20is%20powered%20by,116%E2%80%93124%20t)%20MTOW.

Here is a diagram of a Rolls-Royce RB211. It says the opening of the turbine of a RB211 is 84.8 inches in diameter. (7 feet)

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/3-s2.0-B0122274105003562-gr7.jpg

Here is a photo of President Trumps plane (757), look at the size of the opening of the plane turbine and the person standing next to the plane. Look at the center hub of the turbine, compare its size to the person standing next to the plane.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/donald-trump-indicted-former-president-boards-plane-to-new-york-for-arraignment

Here is a photo from the Pentagon on 9/11. Look at the round object behind the person on the left. That is the center hub of a turbine from the object that hit the Pentagon. Notice anything wrong?

https://imgs.search.brave.com/NGUc0ay2TyfCDEfydK45e91via2oHTPBl9z4DX6DCa8/rs:fit:860:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9hZXJv/c3BhY2V3ZWIub3Jn/L3F1ZXN0aW9uL2Nv/bnNwaXJhY3kvcGVu/dGFnb24vcGVudGFn/b24tZW5naW5lMS5q/cGc

68 comments

68 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (68)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– DeathRayDesigner 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Evidence of what? Conspiracy for what?

There is already a video that shows a plane, but the conspiracy theorists are devoted not to see it as anything other than their fantasy. Other videos would simply be dismissed as "more conspiracy".

But why move them at all? Presumably they are already selected for overlapping coverage from ideal locations (if they exist).

Do you even listen to yourself? If a plane, made of metal stronger than the strongest bones in our body, is going to be disintegrated by impact, then it follows absolutely that human flesh will be shredded. The plane's final motions had multiple witnesses---are you going to claim they are all liars, operating to a common plan?

The main deck would be the main penetrator, but the fuselage would be along for the ride until it is stripped off. Which way do you want it? That the whole fuselage penetrated intact? Or that it never penetrated at all? You don't seem to grasp the concept that a collision of this kind involves structure coming apart.

Give it a rest. The evidence is very clear. You just don't like it...for reasons I can only ascribe to personal preference. Why you would have a preference for how a disaster occurred is very strange, since the proper human reaction is to prefer that it never happened, but that is not an option in this case.

I had an exchange with someone who was convinced it was a Scud missile. A complete ignoramus. Didn't understand in any way how a Scud travels to its target. Just as most people don't understand that even a cruise missile does not follow the flight path they imagine. The power of ignorance overwhelms evidence, I am sorry to say. A poor suit for anons to wear.