Salty Cracker and Wall Street Apes are now insinuating it. The op was a success, they've created a narrative binary where either space lasers did it or climate change (MSM narrative) did it. Meanwhile the much more likely story (strategic arson ahead of high winds + collusion with crooked state and local officials to mishandle the response on purpose) has effectively been shoved under the rug. Now instead of having the entire internet digging into that to possibly find some arsonists or conspiracies to mishandle response, they are instead "laser focused" on space lasers.
Of course, if the DEW theory is correct, this is fine. I just don't think it is.
endrant
Yep, a blue laser will reflect off a blue object. Weapon lasers are not optical lasers. You can do things on a tabletop that does not translate to things you can do in the field. I saw a 10-watt CO2 laser produce a dime-sized white-hot spot on a piece of firebrick, but that is no more heat than a 10-watt incandescent light bulb produces and we do not burn down houses with 10-watt light bulbs.
I suppose you could run around with a tabletop laser and power supply, using it to replace kitchen matches. Do you realize how idiotic that would be?
Just coincidence then that several pedos on the island painted their entire house a hideous blue color? Or that blue cars or even blue umbrellas didnt burn?
False myth. Blue things did burn.
Prove it
Here's a report on the subject. I am taking it at face value. You get to prove it is all a lie (if you can). Denunciations, imaginations, and changing the topic are not elements of proof. (I pointed this out in a post a few days ago, but I suppose the down-voting was overwhelming.) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/maui-theory-about-blue-objects-being-saved-from-wildfires-is-baseless/ar-AA1fG2MX