💥BQQM !!! -- Dr Jan Halper - Hayes -- 🔹REMOVES🔹 The * MASKS * of Xiden !💥
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (109)
sorted by:
If everything you are seeing makes sense and is consistent with the belief that the guy we see up there is the real Joe Biden, by all means, believe it. Like Jan Halper keeps saying, always trust your own instincts more than anything else.
As for me, it makes no sense. The entire plan would only work if the guy they put up there is completely under WH control and the real joe biden was long removed.
That, plus the clear difference between the guy called Joe Biden 10 years ago vs the guy who attended Trump's unauguration.
Plus, Trump telling us that Joe was shot and the rest of his description of Joe.
Plus, the fact that Joe is willingly acting like a complete incompetent nut job and willingly sabotaging everything the Cabal is doing.
Not when it is clear what kind of a criminal he is, and when people wake and learn that they. were indeed going to kill us all. The people then would be thanking the WHs for putting a fake guy, and not letting half the humanity be killed off and the rest enslaved. NO ONE would say "How DARE you put a fake Biden??"
Like everything thats happening, its all ultimately being done by the Cabal, but controlled by the WHs. Cabal knows this is not real Biden, but they think they control him. As it is becoming clear thay he is not, they are the ones themselves now throwing him under the bus.
This is what makes the show so brilliant. There are so many levels of optics and looking at the whole thing as black or white does not do justice to the reality
There is NOT way this plan could succeed if they let real Biden at the helm, even if they think they are controlling. He is far too smart, crafty and connected enough to make that a safe option. PLUS, with the real guy at the helm, there is no way you can trust the rest of the world to play along. Too mamny chances to cut some side deals, make some unexpected moves.
Hmmm. Thanks for the encouragement to trust my own instincts and go from there.
There are a number of factors in the "not the real Joe Biden" idea that don't make sense to me, and haven't thus far, despite exposure to the idea for a few years.
But I hear your arguments, and hear your passion for your view, and I appreciate the willingness to discuss (as too few seem to have a desire or ability to engage with the issue logically or dispassionately). (By passion from you, I mean enthusiasm and sense of conviction, not emotional reactivity, which is what I mean when referring to dispassionate engagement.)
One of the drawbacks of the theory I see is that personally, I am yet to encounter a very thorough or systematic discussion / analysis of the empirical data. All I have seen is people using anecdotal discussions and opinion, saying "Look! Look! They are OBVIOUSLY different!"
In my view, a discussion of the physiological evidence from a forensic standpoint would help lend credibility to the idea. If anyone is doing that, I've not seen it. By forensic, I mean, a clinical physician who actually knows what they are talking about going through the physiological evidence, step by step (and not merely a layman's comparison of pics taken years apart).
As a specialist in my particular field, I appreciate the difference between informed, educated analysis and random off-the-cuff layman views.
But let's put all that aside. When / where did Trump tell us that Joe was shot and provide the description you're referring to? I'm all ears (and not the glue attached silicone ones!)
Perhaps like you, I definitely like a layered approach. Conclusions arrived at by drawing together a variety of logical thoughts and evidence.
But I think in this case, there are a number of possibly viable explanations for why the guy in the white house is doing what he's doing, one of which might be he's an impostor actor, but to me it seems there are others.
For example, IF the good guys got all the goods on the Biden Crime family, including using Hunter as a willing (or unwilling) human source, AND the real objective of the whole operation was not simply to take down the Bidens, but the entire corrupt pantheon of Cabalites, THEN making the Biden Crime family flip for some level of immunity or leniency would seem a likely move.
I also think it's logical to hypothesize that the Bidens are possibly the most obvious, foolish and penetrable example or node of the US Cabal. Big enough, close enough (VP, Working directly with Obama, in the cesspool for decades) screwed up enough (Hunter's vulnerability, Joe's obvious and overt predilection for perversion, general extended family dysfunction: i.e. Ashley, etc) and careless enough ("Well what do you know! He fired him!" publicly and openly).
Smart? Joe comes across as a dumbass, imo. Clinton(s), Obamas, Nancy, etc, all seem to really play their impressions slickly, but NOT the Bidens. (But that's only an impression.)
So from that angle, I think that it would be a distinct advantage to have locked in Joe's WHOLE FAMILY or at least Joe/Hunter, and use them to crack open the whole thing, by getting him to play a role. It would obviously mean making it perfectly and abundantly clear to Joe etc that they have NO OTHER OPTIONS.
Think Trump on his world tour visiting Israel, the Vatican, Brussels, London, etc. he showed them the goods, and essentially forced them into a specific direction.
I appreciate your outlining your perspective. You prompt food for thought. That said, I really wonder how much of the whole operation is going to come out and become wide public knowledge within this generation?
Also, if the Cabal KNOWS this is not the former Joe Biden, then WHO replaced him? The Cabal? Why? How would that provide ANY advantage to them? Wouldn't that give them a massive liability for exposure? Then WHO? If it was the white hats, then WHY would the Cabal think they could control that person?
Another question I find hard to resolve is; IF this was a fake Joe Biden, then WHO would know about it? How many people? Is Jill fake, Hunter fake, James fake? What about his who extended family and contacts from a lifetime? How many people could know and if they knew, WHY would they keep quiet? Force? benefit? Threat? If threat of consequences, then why would that NOT also be viable means to control the real Joe in the first place?
I can appreciate a guy in a mask for a 24 hour operation ala Mission Impossible, but permanently? or perhaps you think it is not a mask thing, but a lookalike? Substitute?
A lot of this is speculation reasoning, and I think there are multiple possible answers.
Well, that really depends on how much of the game board the patriots control. I think they have a lot more control than what the normie view would even imagine.
A lot of this is assertion and conclusions but how concrete is it? Who needs to play along? Who needs to know? If so, why? If the original Biden was fully controlled, aka had capitulated to the White Hats, how dangerous would that be?
Game theory.
The only point I find very persuasive from your argument here is the one about "Not when it is clear what kind of a criminal he is, and when people wake and learn that they, were indeed going to kill us all." I think that's arguable (I mean, I can see how that might be argued in the positive sense).
In any case, all any of us can do is try to apply to work our best judgment and establish working ideas that advance what we are trying to do.
For me, I'm still very unconvinced by the whole Not My Joe Biden theories. In my own frame of mind, I see too many counter arguments and alternative and more plausible explanations for events.
On that note, do you know of any extensive papers or discussions on the whole question? Published and out there in alt-media or the anon sphere?
In any case, thanks for the reply, and sharing your views. FI
Agreed that if there was a forensic proof beyond a shadow of doubt, everyone would believe that this is not the real Biden. But, do the WHs want that? Obviously not, since it will bring the entire devolution crashing before its time. Thats why everything has an element of plausible deniability, and only a calibrated percent of people who can see behind the mask (so to speak).
When the calibration needs to be increased (as in they want more people waking up at a given time), they unleash people like Dr Halper.
This is a good thought process. Lets take this a bit further. What if Biden refused to play along? What if whatever leniency/immunity (I am guessing anything beyond life on Gitmo instead of execution would not be an option for someone like Biden) they offer, he just doesnt care?
The next question is, why not pick someone else. And I will argue that picking Biden was not just a draw of the lot. I think Biden is a crucial character in the Cabal's activities, and it has to be some with this kind of extensive corruption.
This is a good place to address your next point:
Think back carefully. When did Joe even come on your radar? For me it was only after Trump first predicted that Joe will be the final nominee for the Dems and at that time I did not believe it. Joe has always been under the radar and never left any kind of lasting impression (atleast from where I have been watching).
This is not by a coincidence. Unlike Clintons, Obama etc, he as been entrenching himself in the deep state for a very long time. Clinton became governor in 1983. Biden became a senator in 1971.
Biden has been central in orchestrating China's ascent, culminating with entry to WTO in 2001, but it took atleast a decade or more setting it all in motion. This is ay bigger deal that you would think. China represents the Democratic/CIA backed international asset, which overturned the Japan - which represented the Bush/MOS backed asset. There has been a civil war between the CIA/MOS for decades (symbolic decodes guy has tons of decodes on this) and in the end the CIA faction emerged victorious, and Biden was crucial in that.
I would also make a bold prediction that, it will come out that during Obama presidency Biden was the puppet master, and hence why he was the VP.
The "dumb Joe" look became obvious only after the real Joe was neutralized and the plan was set in motion to make devolution propelled under "Biden"
Hunter definitely turned against his dad. Baeu died mysteriously. All the kids molested by their granddad. The only possibility is Jill - who was probably his handler. I havent analyzed her much, but its possible she was turned / replaced. But the rest of the family most probably co-operated and hence this plan is possible.
White hats control all the strings. Their string to any person at the helm of presidency is probably the most dangerous. Lots of presidents have rebelled against their controllers, leading to extreme happenings of historic importance (assassinations, resignations etc).
The point is, Presidency is highly susceptible to optic. One wrong move, and pulling the string to stop it / damage control it and the whole plan might go awry.
So here is a better way to think about it. Ask yourself, which option would you prefer if you had to pick, for this devolution? 1. Real Biden neutralized to the best of your knowledge and with a figurative gun pointed from behind the scenes OR 2. Replacing Biden with a friendly guy who will fool the Cabal, and do exactly as told.
The answer will always be 2 since between the two, since going with 1 would incur unnecessary risks.
So you can expend your efforts in making 2 possible (and doing what it takes) rather than sitting there tensely waiting for the shoe to fall while you unleash the real biden to the world.
Again, how do you know he did capitulate? For all we know, he went to the gallows kicking and screaming until the last breath.
I am not sure what you expect when you say "extensive papers". There will never be any proof that does not have plausible deniability. There are plenty of videos on the internet that goes into various aspects, including body feature comparisions. But none of them will be "definitive proof".
Some good thoughts and worthy ideas raised, though in general they don't really address the red flags I have on the matter (theory).
It should be noted that I myself am not so foolish or nooby to aspire to or even desire "definitive proof". And, if plausible deniability exists, then it means that one can never really be certain anyway.
The options you cite re: a foil for devolution quantify only two aspects that is, if "all things being equal, would you prefer A or would you prefer B?" But to my mind, its NOT the case that all things are being equal. Either A or B both have unique problems and unique advantages and are more than likely subject to unique or differing constraints, liabilities etc. It is all those many different aspects that my own thought processes tell me are what need to be weighed up.
In a game of chess, it is about overall control, and not necessarily absolute control over this or that piece.
Casein point:
Do you think that in the past, there have been game-board situations that are identical or equivalent to the game board today? I do not.
In addition, I should probably add that I view the game board as multidimensional, in this sense.
Heaven (in the sense of Asian Philosophy - 天) exists. God, the higher spiritual realms exist and act out, and interact with those living on the earthly plane. Many on the earthly plane understand a sphere of the action, but not the overall plan and objectives of Heaven.
But in general, the spiritual realm is the realm of cause, and the material realm is the realm of effect. Thus, historical incidents "extreme happenings of historic importance" may appear to have causation in the material realm (plans, intrigues, actors and agendas) but are in fact underlined by causation in the spiritual realms.
Thus, while Heaven is executing its plan and objectives, those on earth may be carrying out certain roles and undertaking certain objectives, but that doesn't mean they are in control of everything. Indeed, if they enjoy control, it is likely because, like avatars and champions designated to fight on behalf of others, they execute control (and have the commensurate responsibility) because it has been granted to them.
By which I mean, there are likely many factors we ourselves are not aware of, as we do NOT have the responsibility to execute those things. We are not meant to know. What we are meant to do is to find out what we need to know in order to execute OUR responsibility.
That constraint should be kept in mind, I believe. When I look at some of the ideas and theories out there, and HOW people pursue them, I will often have misgivings because I don't really see how those ideas, theories and approaches actually HELP those people to grasp and fulfill THEIR own responsibility.
Indeed, a theory or hypothesis can be used as a self-inflicted distraction, or as a convenient excuse to ignore or avoid other things that are required in order to grasp, understand and execute a person's responsibility. Are the ideas, the theories productive? Do they advance the necessity for fulfilling personal responsibility, or collective responsibility?
This is also something I take into consideration, in addition to logicality, reasoning, and material data, etc.
Moving on...
Well, I don't. (I never said I did.) My question was "IF (A)", then what? It's supposition, then looking down the line at what that might imply, and indicate, and play out.
I think its safe to say that NONE of us "KNOW" what the reality of the situation is. But by being circumspect in how we approach things, with enough reflection on our own internal processes to make the actions (approaches) we use bear fruit in terms of self-development, then that's a plus.
There are many things we may never know, but I think in one sense, the real opportunity here is that we are presented with an opportunity to engage with the world (including the information, the narratives, the action) in ways that can enhance and promote our own personal and collective development. If its challenging, that's a good thing. But the objective may not be to 'know' but to uncover how I think, why i think what I think, how I've been programmed, and to what extent I've really understood myself in relation to the world.
Final word: by extensive papers, again, I mean material that I could read, digest and find convincing. It's not about having proof. It's about how I engage with the material, and I have not found material or reasoning that I find convincing. I have found a LOT of material in other areas that I find extremely convincing, and by and large, my own personal experiences play a key part in any confirmation I arrive at.
(E.g the "Q proofs" ala deltas, etc, and drops, were never a big deal for me; I saw many other proofs that were far more convincing or relevant to me that Q is legit.)
That's one of the red flags the "biden is fake" theories have for me. Does it make ANY difference to me, to my support for DJT, for my role and engagement with the Plan, or to any other anons? Ultimately, it feels irrelevant, actually. (meaning whether it is a or whether it is b, the net effects are basically the same). So why is so much energy attached to it? Why do some people fixate on it to the Nth degree, indulging in such an expression of unabashed certainty, when of course they CANNOT actually know?
and so on.
I like the discussion. It is good. There is much food for thought in your ideas and thinking, and when I can engage without all the emotional overtones that the "I am certain, and there can be no doubt crowd" engenders, it's a lot easier to keep an open mind. Or at least, keeping the mind open is a lot more pleasant, when people aren't engaged with a personal and emotional attachment to their own ideas that overpowers open thinking.
More later.
Good stuff fren, much to discuss. Will write a longer reply tomorrow, but hereis a compilation of all the times Trump hinted this, turns out more times than even I knew!
Thanks.
See also my comment here in another thread.