Oberlin College Administrators Caught on Secret Recording Reprimanding Head Lacrosse Coach for Defending Women’s Sports | IWF
As part of its female athlete storytelling series, Independent Women’s Forum broke the story of Kim Russell, the Head Women’s Lacrosse Coach at Oberlin College, in an exclusive documentary that exposes Oberlin administrators and athletic department executi...
Feminism was not about women, it was about a leftist-communistic agenda. It can not be more clear than now, when women are thrown under the bus, and have to allow themselves to be beaten in women's sports, by people who are not women,
who have to allow into their locker rooms and sorority houses, people who are not women and when even have erections in their presence, are still presumed to be women?? When the left admits it cannot even define "woman".
Sauce: Clay and Buck radio today. A judge allowed a person with an erection as a woman within a sorority house.
Guys, this is INSANE! When will feminist-indoctrinated women wake the heck UP? FEMINISM was not about WOMEN, it was about changing societal norms and WOMEN ARE STILL ALLOWING THIS INSANITY TO SUCCEED! In the name of WOMEN??
HEY females, women, you are being USED! The so-called "patriarchy" of loving fathers, husbands, and sons, did not do this to you! It is YOUR turn to feminism, and "protection" you presume by the government so you could cast off your loving fathers and husbands and sons, that is throwing you under the bus, the train, the avalanche, etc.
Well spoken. It’s the same as gun control is not about guns, but control.
The depth of the indoctrination is demonstrated bythe fact that one of her (womens') team members reported her. Whoever she is, that woman is advocating for her own irrelevance, probably in total ignorance of its consequences, and she might never see it until a 6'1 bruiser with a fake woman certificate gives her a shoulder-check or concussion.
Get THIS. Women are the weaker of the species, and MEN have traditionally protected them! Feminism said . . . we don't need no patriarch men!
So NOW they get other patriarch men with erections in their private spaces.
When will they admit that giving gov't the power over them was a mistake??
Amen to that. I'm pretty sure Ayn Rand mentioned this as part of the communist agenda in her book "We the Living". She based it on her own experiences in Russia just after the revolution.
It achieved several things: It allowed unbalanced women to get into positions of power (either corporate or govt). These same women would have just been the type of loony who at most would have terrorized their own families and other housewives. Feminism unleashed them on the rest of us.
Secondly, it created dual-income homes, which increased the tax-base which allowed the government to spend spend spend. The extra income also boosted corporate sales.
Thirdly, women having full-time jobs meant kids went into indoctrination centers (daycares, etc) for a large part of the day. The argument was made at the time that "studies had shown" that there would be no damage to children. I think we can see the actual outcome of the process now, after one generation.
And fourth, all of this basically destroyed family structures. Where once kids could depend on their mom being home for them during the day, they now had to compete with "mom's bad day at work". Then mom was made to feel guilty and instead of quitting and staying home with the kiddies, they started spending even more money to buy off their kids. And since mommy wasn't home to cook, and mommy felt bad, kids started getting fed whatever fast food garbage was being pushed by the TV as regular meals rather than the occasional treat. So now their kids were unhealthy, as well - both physically and mentally.
I don't think that the people pushing feminism knew where this was going to go (not enough data back in the 70s/80s), but it's continuing to have long-term negative effects that are highly visible now.
Yes it destroyed the family structure as the norm. Homes without fathers, not good for children! Kids institutionally warehoused from birth.
Not good for women, being forced into the labor market, where many work jobs which are not -- what feminism promised, reaching one's potential etc. Wage slave instead of homemaker, which they preached to women as if that were slavery!
That was the part that gets me - saying that "staying home equals slavery", but then being locked into a job with a schedule and bosses and co-workers that you have to put up with no matter what, is some sort of freedom.
I think one of the few positive benefits of Covid/lockdowns was that more younger women got the chance to experience a homelife that they themselves never had and they liked it so much that they stayed home.
Sounds like another Gibson's Bakery type lawsuit. I guess the $39.6 million paid to Gibson's was not enough to get the Administration to get their act together. This lawsuit, if she files, should be worth about $10 million.
Oberlin College can’t seem to learn when to keep their mouths shut. Maybe they want another multi million dollar lawsuit to sue them into oblivion.