Can't comment on the account but check out the Maui's DE lab webpage. Their intro video boasts of the capability to use lasers to blow things up. It could target a house then cause it to catch fire.
Did you even see the DEW lab in Maui? They are saying, hey we have a dew lab in Maui and can blow things up from far away. Say what you will, it should give you pause and say, well that is sure an odd coincidence. Like a virus lab in Wuhan.
I'm not on the DEW train either, but why the assertion that we need footage of a car
spontaneously combusting? Wouldn't they just direct the energy to some grass or wood to start the fire and let the wind do the rest?
I'm not even taking sides on what caused the fires. All I'm saying is that it is a really interesting coincidence that one of two DEW labs in the country happens to be in Maui. And by their own website boast of such capabilities. Not sure why you're so defensive. Also, if we use your line of reasoning, show me an arsonist in action otherwise it's climate change.
You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.
"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."
I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. Where else are we seeing this being used? Yes, the same tactic is being used against DJT.
The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.
The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.
Psyops are basically huge magic tricks, where the concept of reality is distorted through repetitive suggestion and cultivated group think. The internet takes it global and Big Tech exaggerates consensus and quashes dissent.
Most humans feel isolated without the group and resist individual critical thought, to a fault. It's why all this works.
Can't comment on the account but check out the Maui's DE lab webpage. Their intro video boasts of the capability to use lasers to blow things up. It could target a house then cause it to catch fire.
https://afresearchlab.com/technology/directed-energy/
Read my comments. I am directly opposed to the DEW Psyop and frankly, have zero respect for those pushing it....
enough already..
Did you even see the DEW lab in Maui? They are saying, hey we have a dew lab in Maui and can blow things up from far away. Say what you will, it should give you pause and say, well that is sure an odd coincidence. Like a virus lab in Wuhan.
find the footage of a car or house spontaneously bursting into flames
all your 'proof' is speculation, imagination or completely FALSE
Speculation.
I'm not on the DEW train either, but why the assertion that we need footage of a car spontaneously combusting? Wouldn't they just direct the energy to some grass or wood to start the fire and let the wind do the rest?
I'm not even taking sides on what caused the fires. All I'm saying is that it is a really interesting coincidence that one of two DEW labs in the country happens to be in Maui. And by their own website boast of such capabilities. Not sure why you're so defensive. Also, if we use your line of reasoning, show me an arsonist in action otherwise it's climate change.
You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.
I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. Where else are we seeing this being used? Yes, the same tactic is being used against DJT.
The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.
The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.
Psyops are basically huge magic tricks, where the concept of reality is distorted through repetitive suggestion and cultivated group think. The internet takes it global and Big Tech exaggerates consensus and quashes dissent.
Most humans feel isolated without the group and resist individual critical thought, to a fault. It's why all this works.
The Great Awakening is the remedy.