First, let us start with a few things I thought was interesting and then finish with the meat of the conversation. Our founding fathers felt it was important to protect our Constitution and the country by vetting Presidential candidates, ensuring the Commander in Chief have no foreign influence. Perfect example is what we see today with China Joe. It has been said we must show the normies, perhaps a partial intention of the Q operation was to provide the public with the knowledge to protect the country in generations to come.
To George Washington from John Jay, 25 July 1787
Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/04-05-02-0251
It's funny, when you do a search asking the following question, "When did Kamal Harris's mother become a US citizen", the search results you get are, FACT CHECK, "Yes, Kamala Harris is eligible to be US President".
That is not the question I asked, what are you hiding? Why would Google assume I was looking up the eligibility of our current VP?
The fact checkers say Kamala became a citizen under the anchor baby rule.
Neither Kamala's mother nor father were US citizens when she was born.
In Book I, Chapter 19, § 212, of the English translation of 1797 (p. 110) Vattel describes what is meant by the term Natural Born Citizen: The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
The child always follows the allegiance of the father.
http://www.usnaturalborncitizen.com/meaningofnaturalborn.html
Harris was born Oct. 20, 1964, and her father was a citizen of Jamaica at the time of her birth.
Specifically, Chapter 2 (entitled Citizenship) of the Jamaica Constitution, Section 3C states:
Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica –
on the sixth day of August 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or
on the date of his/her birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August 1962,
if, at that date, his/her father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent, or
registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica.
So, according to the Jamaican Constitution Kamala is a citizen of Jamacia.
I think that fact would preclude her from having the title, natural born citizen.
You would think that, but that would disqualify her from being vice president as well. And the current Congress seems to have already decided that point by electing her VP. The 12th amendment states very clearly "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." So if Congress considered her ineligible to be President they could not have selected her to be Vice-President. But they did, so they already ruled that she's eligible.
By the way, I agree with you. I don't think she is eligible. Trump has mentioned that the anchor baby thinking is false and that there is legal basis to challenge it.
But I also think that Congress doesn't care at all, and she would get in no problem, and it would have to be challenged at court. (And I think the inauguration was fake anyway and we're in devolution, but that's a whole 'nother topic.)
Congress has abdicated its duties for a long time.
And clearly you are pointing in that direction. When the Congress adopts an onconstotutional law, or act, it violates the trust under the United States.
Of.course this may happen because of all kinds of reasons, yet, it is treason. It requires dissolution and elections to seat a group of Representatives and senators with a clear view of how such a trust should be executed.
This Congress is but the Board of Directors of USA Inc, beyond checks and balances and practicing mob rule democracy on We the People.
Did you ever stop to think, making her VP may have been part of the white plan because they knew she was ineligible?
Nope. I don't think that's going to be challenged. Hope so, but don't think so.
When Pelosi was Speaker and in line for succession, yes, I could totally believe it was the Dems plan.
Remember, ths last speech DJT gave was in front of the fence in Texas. He said Biden may be removed via 25th Amendment. How would he know that? If he knew in advance this would happen, would it not make sense to pair Biden with someone who was ineligible? That puts Kevin McCarthy next in line. Also remember the rules McCarthy had to agree to to take Speaker position. All it takes is one person to demand he be relieved of duty. Who would step in?
It's plausible. I'm all for Biden exiting via the 25th. I just think they'll find some other reason to sidestep Kamala, like 25th'ing her via Covid or her resigning, instead of the natural-born test. But you could be right.
It does not matter if a bunch of traitors in the US Congress, who have no balls or backbone, think that the Moon is made of cheese.
So what?
No, they ILLEGALLY proceeded without even discussing that issue.
They have violated their oath of office in doing so.
This is what needs to be exposed, among 100 other things.
Exactly. Most of them are traitors, just as Q said.