Very interesting Delta. Not sure if been posted
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Does anyone truly believe Q's 5 yr delta here? That it was planned 5 yrs ago on this day the Uniparty would arbitrarily fund another $1 billion to Ukariane?
No, IMO; It seems the white hat/military operation has forced the breaking news narrative from what Q posted 5 yrs ago. It is the plan. Which means the military knew there would be a Russia invasion of Ukraine to clean-up the CIA mess and corruption in their government.
Blinken is the current Secty of State. He is obviously controlled by the military for his role in this crazy movie we're watching. That movie is called; 'THE PLAN.'
As for the Obama exposure. same scenario, some high profile news reporter had to be the one to interview Obama's gay encounter. As years passed and moves/countermoves played out, Tucker is now the likely choice.
When there are countless "coincidences" like these, the answer is yes.
It’s statistically tougher to meet this one too? I’m not a mathematician but it’s two coincidences that end up liking up on the same delta. That’s mind blowing and to your point, there are far too many coincidences for them to be accidental. It’s not possible to keep happening.
5 year Delta gives a new understanding to the term D5
u/#q3585
This wasn't a debut of Larry Sinclair's Expose. He actually did a full press conference with Q&A back in 2008.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QK0eGp3N6A
Having Tucker interview him on the same day that the $1B is rolled out certainly is part of the show.
So the obv question is how did Q know $1B would be rolled out on this particular day to match the delta? Can Q see into the future? Is Q part of the govt agenda? Is Q a psyop? Did Q discover a schedule prepared by the fascists to destroy the one country that has been fucking up their plans for a centralized world government?
All valid questions.
The difference between you and many others here is that they have actually been digging and researching the seeds of information posted by Q. Any one thing can be pulled apart in and of itself... but the entire body? no.
There are certainly a lot of deltas presented that I personally categorize as potential nonsense. I don't think this is one of them. This one is likely designed to encourage people to dig deep into the truth of both these bits of information and signal that it is time for the results of these deep dives be exposed for all to see.
You see, Q is not about lazily sucking up the news cycle. It has been and continues to be a mechanism to drive people to find the truth of it all and share what they find. Some dig deeper than others, to be sure. And, some truths perhaps have not been dug for deep enough.
How far are you willing to dig to find the truth? Are you just going to rely on the opinions you've formed based on information that has been spoon fed to you? Or will you get off your high horse and actually research the answers to your questions. Perhaps you are too disinterested which is your privilege. However, if you are not willing to do your own research to prove or disprove your opinion then questioning others' beliefs when you won't even question yours lacks honor, integrity, and relevance.