ONE

I often feel challenged by these sorts of decodes/interpretations. I'm more of a language guy, less than numbers, and I find my q-proofs in other things, and not so much in these sorts of time stamp networks, which seem a bit like spiders webs to me. I think its just the way my brain tends to work.

(I imagine there are a number of pedes who are the same)

So, one thing I would really love to see is a word based description of what your graphic here is saying, u/queue-anon.

What's the thought process? What is to all saying? Step by step.

Do you think that might be possible? The same thing, but described using words rather than graphics?

TWO

The dominoes effect tweex by Elon, coming so quickly after Tucker's interview is a massive bomb. I think there are a few notables here:

Firstly, the tweet points directly to the Hot Dog party in the White House. It's not about Obama being gaey or anything, but about the culmination of a series of events pointing to the highest forms of corruption at the highest level.

Secondly, Elon posts "Dominoes Effect" and not "Domino Effect". A google search for "Dominoes effect" delivers 23,300 hits, and Elon's twix is something like the 7th one down. Contrast this with "domino effect" which gets 6,370,000 hits. So why "dominoes effect" and not "domino effect"?

Under "videos" Google delivers this video clip for "dominoes effect": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNQniZaQ7MY posted on Sept 1. The 'artist' is a 'virtual' human, @noonoouri . A search of @noonoouri on google tells us "Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?" published by Forbes 2 days ago, and within the last 24 hours, "warner music signs record deal with first AI virtual popstar noonoouri".

Hmmmm.....

Thirdly, the Pizza emoticon in Elon's tweex is so direct that it's hard to see that as anything but a very, very solid direct confirmation that Musk know Q very well (whether you consider this as a proof that the musk account, and therefore musk himself, is white hat or not is up to you).

Curiously enough, The Defect Lads (JH, Burning Bright) just discussed the concept of Overton's Goalposts (See BB's most recent substack Overton's Goalpost, wherein the process of shifting the goalposts indicates retreat or losses by the enemy in the info-war / mind war / narrative war:

Briefly, then a truth narrative is released (e.g. Hunter's crooked dealings), the enemy at first denies the stories (he never did that), then is forced to concede and moves to diminish the story (he did that but it wasn't important), then qualifies ((he did that, but it wasn't illegal or anything), then distract (whatever), then admit (yes, its true) and then circle back to the deny stage on a new level (Hunter was directly involved in illegal activities, yes, BUT Joe Biden knew nothing about it). Then the process repeats with Sleepy Joe (He knew nothing about those activities), then diminish (He knew about them, but didn't know they were illegal), etc.

The boys at defected posited that we're in the middle of the process with Joe Biden, as it has been widely conceded now that yet, hunter's laptop is real and yes, he did those illegal activities, etc. They then posited that AFTER the process with Joe Biden takes place (when it becomes clear and apparent aka recognized that Joe Biden was involved directly with the highest level of corruption in influence peddling, etc, for bribe money etc, that it will lead where?

Directly To Obama.

The developments of this past week seem to indicate that this Overton's Window (The normie world now starting to talk about Obama's corruption) is being pushed hard. Notably coming on the tail of the Obama Chef incident a few weeks (?) back.

Overton's Goalpost is a conceptual framework for thinking about how the narrative Overton Window shifts and how this indicates loss or success for the opponents in the information war.