Logos are fixed in the field of the frame. There are no moving logos, at least not in the time frame of interest.
But it is one thing to surmise, quite another to prove. There is no proof of any such manipulation, and plenty of observational, photographic, and material evidence for the collision. Your arguments are of the same form as the "We never went to the Moon" crowd. When everything is a lie---why should I believe you? And why should you believe that everything is a lie?
Where is the proof that there were no moving logos at the time?
It's established fact that the TV networks were all working with Digital TV signals, most at 1080i for the main subchannel, except I believe for FOX which was doing 720p. Digital signals enable logo insertion and all sorts of other manipulation, and the code to make it move is basic linear math. You simply refuse to imagine it. Why is that?
How big is the lie that Biden won the election? Yet people believe it. If they can lie that large then no "facts" are safe, so it's prudent to start from zero. I don't need planes for the simplest explanation. Maybe they were there, but I'm not sold on it. Same goes for the moon. Fakery and brainwash is simpler and cheaper. Same for the pandemic. Totally fake would've worked, with placebos for the jabs.
It's difficult to give up on so many "truths". But I found I can live without moon landings or the dinosaurs and not much changes. If eventually they prove truly real then I'll celebrate. But we have to turn the corner on so much else first.
The only "proof" that is relevant is proof that the image has been doctored. Accusation stemming from a prejudiced viewpoint is not evidence at all. You might as well suspect that the Twin Towers were never hit, and that they are still standing. Anything to the contrary is a carefully contrived cover.
It is clear that you embrace fakery so long as it feeds your bias confirmation. The planes were there in all 4 cases, witnessed, caused damage, and killed hundreds of people. You want to imagine that it basically did not happen and that there were gratuitious explosions from conspirators and the vanishing of hundreds of people. The fact that you can doubt the Apollo program shows that you are willing to twist everything into fakery. When you do that, you are building your world on lies...and you don't seem to realize that doing so is counter to what we are supposed to be doing.
I'm not saying we should not question, but we have to accept the real answers, or the questions are superfluous. All that seems to happen is that some of us pose a question---and answer it with a conspiracy theory, and that's the end of the question.
No basis for doubt. All the "questions" I've seen have been simple scientific ignorance. Moreover, doubts don't prove anything except ignorance. The proper challenge is a proof of the contrary.
Logos are fixed in the field of the frame. There are no moving logos, at least not in the time frame of interest.
But it is one thing to surmise, quite another to prove. There is no proof of any such manipulation, and plenty of observational, photographic, and material evidence for the collision. Your arguments are of the same form as the "We never went to the Moon" crowd. When everything is a lie---why should I believe you? And why should you believe that everything is a lie?
Where is the proof that there were no moving logos at the time?
It's established fact that the TV networks were all working with Digital TV signals, most at 1080i for the main subchannel, except I believe for FOX which was doing 720p. Digital signals enable logo insertion and all sorts of other manipulation, and the code to make it move is basic linear math. You simply refuse to imagine it. Why is that?
How big is the lie that Biden won the election? Yet people believe it. If they can lie that large then no "facts" are safe, so it's prudent to start from zero. I don't need planes for the simplest explanation. Maybe they were there, but I'm not sold on it. Same goes for the moon. Fakery and brainwash is simpler and cheaper. Same for the pandemic. Totally fake would've worked, with placebos for the jabs.
It's difficult to give up on so many "truths". But I found I can live without moon landings or the dinosaurs and not much changes. If eventually they prove truly real then I'll celebrate. But we have to turn the corner on so much else first.
exactly!
The only "proof" that is relevant is proof that the image has been doctored. Accusation stemming from a prejudiced viewpoint is not evidence at all. You might as well suspect that the Twin Towers were never hit, and that they are still standing. Anything to the contrary is a carefully contrived cover.
It is clear that you embrace fakery so long as it feeds your bias confirmation. The planes were there in all 4 cases, witnessed, caused damage, and killed hundreds of people. You want to imagine that it basically did not happen and that there were gratuitious explosions from conspirators and the vanishing of hundreds of people. The fact that you can doubt the Apollo program shows that you are willing to twist everything into fakery. When you do that, you are building your world on lies...and you don't seem to realize that doing so is counter to what we are supposed to be doing.
I'm not saying we should not question, but we have to accept the real answers, or the questions are superfluous. All that seems to happen is that some of us pose a question---and answer it with a conspiracy theory, and that's the end of the question.
So the Apollo program is your sacred cow? No doubts allowed? Why?
No basis for doubt. All the "questions" I've seen have been simple scientific ignorance. Moreover, doubts don't prove anything except ignorance. The proper challenge is a proof of the contrary.