I recall Col. Proudy claiming the engine was 'dumped' there and that was the ONLY explanation for the mismatched serial numbers... That's where you got that information, isn't it?
And then he went on to spread lies that the attacks were CGI, part of Operation Blue Beam.
Proudy is 100% spook and is the original SOURCE for the CGI psyop.
Yea, I heard about "the sidewalk", but general location relative to the building / impact zone would be interesting. And, of course, some visual images. I imagine the understanding is that the other engines were never found in the rubble and "likely melted down to something unrecognizable due to the heat", right?
If you have a link you can provide, I would appreciate it. Thank you.
That engine was NOT a match for the alleged airplane that it came from.
of course not.. but where did it come from?
It was from a plane that NEVER WAS Flight175
I recall Col. Proudy claiming the engine was 'dumped' there and that was the ONLY explanation for the mismatched serial numbers... That's where you got that information, isn't it?
And then he went on to spread lies that the attacks were CGI, part of Operation Blue Beam.
Proudy is 100% spook and is the original SOURCE for the CGI psyop.
Where'd they find this engine? What kind of shape was it in? Could it have been "planted" after the fact, during all the confusion?
you should know that already...
it's been 22 years.
I know both narratives. The fake one, it was planted. And the real one, it went through the WTC and landed on the sidewalk.
Yea, I heard about "the sidewalk", but general location relative to the building / impact zone would be interesting. And, of course, some visual images. I imagine the understanding is that the other engines were never found in the rubble and "likely melted down to something unrecognizable due to the heat", right?
If you have a link you can provide, I would appreciate it. Thank you.