Except the slow mow video shows the plane disappearing with no damage to the building until the explosion happens.
It's either 1) edited so that it is made to look like CGI, or 2) real.
Way too many other coincidences and unexplainable anomalies to believe one way or the other, which is exactly what the Deep State loves. Another JFK conspiracy that can last, and last and last.
That is not what happened and viewing many other videos of the impact and the testimony of thousands of witnesses, prove a passenger jet flew directing into the South Tower. The zoom on this video completely blurred out the impact zone.
The size and nature of the explosion are another story. The delay is very similar to bunker buster bombs as is the ferocity and power of the explosion. Total pulverization of tons of concrete, instantaneously, with the debris being ejected out the entry side of the impact. That is impossible with anything other than high explosives. Fuel does melt steel beams AND has very little kinetic energy upon ignition.
This is odd. I'm pretty sure I saw this video a year or two ago. At the time, someone said that the voices and people screaming were added in, too.
I saw this a number of years ago and it appears authentic.
In fact, it's an excellent perspective of the approach and impact and natural reactions of witnesses.
Except the slow mow video shows the plane disappearing with no damage to the building until the explosion happens.
It's either 1) edited so that it is made to look like CGI, or 2) real.
Way too many other coincidences and unexplainable anomalies to believe one way or the other, which is exactly what the Deep State loves. Another JFK conspiracy that can last, and last and last.
That is not what happened and viewing many other videos of the impact and the testimony of thousands of witnesses, prove a passenger jet flew directing into the South Tower. The zoom on this video completely blurred out the impact zone.
The size and nature of the explosion are another story. The delay is very similar to bunker buster bombs as is the ferocity and power of the explosion. Total pulverization of tons of concrete, instantaneously, with the debris being ejected out the entry side of the impact. That is impossible with anything other than high explosives. Fuel does melt steel beams AND has very little kinetic energy upon ignition.
https://youtu.be/hiAfzCV7wkU?t=46
Depleted Uranium warheads are radioactive, too.
I just completely disagree with your statements. That's all I can say. I've seen and read just as much information to suggest different conclusions.