Except the slow mow video shows the plane disappearing with no damage to the building until the explosion happens.
It's either 1) edited so that it is made to look like CGI, or 2) real.
Way too many other coincidences and unexplainable anomalies to believe one way or the other, which is exactly what the Deep State loves. Another JFK conspiracy that can last, and last and last.
That is not what happened and viewing many other videos of the impact and the testimony of thousands of witnesses, prove a passenger jet flew directing into the South Tower. The zoom on this video completely blurred out the impact zone.
The size and nature of the explosion are another story. The delay is very similar to bunker buster bombs as is the ferocity and power of the explosion. Total pulverization of tons of concrete, instantaneously, with the debris being ejected out the entry side of the impact. That is impossible with anything other than high explosives. Fuel does melt steel beams AND has very little kinetic energy upon ignition.
They’ve proven time and again that the fuel burning temperatures were no where near what it takes to melt steel. Even if it was a viable thing, the buildings disintegrating in demolition fashion is absurd. The beams would have melted in an assymetrical fashion, causing a tilted partial collapse of one side of the building. The fact that two buildings fell in the exact same demolition fashion makes it doubly absurd. And don’t even get me started on building seven. That just fell in sympathy to it’s two big brothers.
The most compelling case for controlled demolition can be found among the architects who can show that a structural steel building-even heavily damaged by fire- will not collapse. If a fire can collapse a structural steel building, everything know about architecture and engineering skyscrapers completely goes out the window. If I can find the video on Rumble I’ll post here.
All great info. Thanks. I was aware of that. So, it is plausible that rather than pull off the incredibly difficult task of having unqualified hijackers actually hijack a plane with box cutters and then fly complicated jets on extremely difficult flight patterns (that pilots have claimed were very difficult for experienced pilots)... instead, create the illusion of planes hitting the towers--and land the real planes and transition them as explained in your notes above. This way, he gets the planes to add to his inventory. And he gets the causes of the explosions that were actually placed by the Mossad (not to mention the Mossad wiring the entirety of the towers for controlled demolition).
I feel the plan had to be retrofitted with explosives, if it even was there but I do not know one way or the other for sure because I did not see it with my own eyes. Could all those people there just come on tv or the internet and confirm what they saw, I mean they can be paid off as well but that is a lot to keep a secret. What would it be worth to you to keep quiet? 5 million? 10 million? Threats of your family?
Except the slow mow video shows the plane disappearing with no damage to the building until the explosion happens.
It's either 1) edited so that it is made to look like CGI, or 2) real.
Way too many other coincidences and unexplainable anomalies to believe one way or the other, which is exactly what the Deep State loves. Another JFK conspiracy that can last, and last and last.
MPEG compression artifacts most likely
That is not what happened and viewing many other videos of the impact and the testimony of thousands of witnesses, prove a passenger jet flew directing into the South Tower. The zoom on this video completely blurred out the impact zone.
The size and nature of the explosion are another story. The delay is very similar to bunker buster bombs as is the ferocity and power of the explosion. Total pulverization of tons of concrete, instantaneously, with the debris being ejected out the entry side of the impact. That is impossible with anything other than high explosives. Fuel does melt steel beams AND has very little kinetic energy upon ignition.
https://youtu.be/hiAfzCV7wkU?t=46
Depleted Uranium warheads are radioactive, too.
They’ve proven time and again that the fuel burning temperatures were no where near what it takes to melt steel. Even if it was a viable thing, the buildings disintegrating in demolition fashion is absurd. The beams would have melted in an assymetrical fashion, causing a tilted partial collapse of one side of the building. The fact that two buildings fell in the exact same demolition fashion makes it doubly absurd. And don’t even get me started on building seven. That just fell in sympathy to it’s two big brothers.
The most compelling case for controlled demolition can be found among the architects who can show that a structural steel building-even heavily damaged by fire- will not collapse. If a fire can collapse a structural steel building, everything know about architecture and engineering skyscrapers completely goes out the window. If I can find the video on Rumble I’ll post here.
The most compelling case is military grade thermite dust covering 10 square blocks. That’s the biggest smoking gun there is.
I just completely disagree with your statements. That's all I can say. I've seen and read just as much information to suggest different conclusions.
OK... so who is Dov Zakheim and how does his central role in the 9/11 plot support my theory.
Explain how he was:
Pentagon Comptroller that stole the $2.3 Trillion
Sat on the board at Raytheon, makers of bunker buster bombs
Was CEO of Securacom, the security company that took over the WTC right after the 1993 Bombing
Board member of Systems Planning Corporation, makers of the Flight Termination System, designed to TAKEOVER and LAND hijacked airliners ( how Ironic )
Had contract with US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fueling platforms, out of Macdill AFB in Tampa
Signed the PNAC, which called for a 'Pearl Harbor' like event to springboard US Military intervention in the Mideast
Oh.... and he's a dual-citizen to Israel and 100% MOSSAD and his parents were from UKRAINE
so.... CGI, in light of this smoking gun and the all the videos and witnesses, is a rather silly disinfo theory, in my humble opinion.
All great info. Thanks. I was aware of that. So, it is plausible that rather than pull off the incredibly difficult task of having unqualified hijackers actually hijack a plane with box cutters and then fly complicated jets on extremely difficult flight patterns (that pilots have claimed were very difficult for experienced pilots)... instead, create the illusion of planes hitting the towers--and land the real planes and transition them as explained in your notes above. This way, he gets the planes to add to his inventory. And he gets the causes of the explosions that were actually placed by the Mossad (not to mention the Mossad wiring the entirety of the towers for controlled demolition).
I feel the plan had to be retrofitted with explosives, if it even was there but I do not know one way or the other for sure because I did not see it with my own eyes. Could all those people there just come on tv or the internet and confirm what they saw, I mean they can be paid off as well but that is a lot to keep a secret. What would it be worth to you to keep quiet? 5 million? 10 million? Threats of your family?
You're asking all the right questions. CGI disinfo is rooted in denying the reality of what happened, including the witnesses and evidence.
lol smh
https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/Conspiracy/2251906
Oh my god stop talking Bush shill.