I'm not really familiar with their religious views. It's that there appears to be cabal/DS retribution because their big plan didn't work out. This seems to be a reoccurring theme. Do you remember all the strange deaths of naturalists, homeopaths, chiropractic, and osteopathic practitioners. This seemed to center around Dr. Bradstreet's treatment of autism using GcMAF. Dr. Bradsteet ended up dead with a shogun wound to his head and chest. They called it a "suicide". CEO Dr. David Noakes company was raided. He was persecuted and jailed for manufacturing GcMAF. British biomedical research scientist Lynda Thyer who has helped many hundreds of patients recover from late-stage cancer in her work with David Noakes at ImmunoBioTech using GcMAF, a naturally occurring protein in the human body and part of the immune system, and who, along with David Noakes, CEO, and nine others has been wrongfully hounded and persecuted in recent times by the MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency), Britain’s Health and Regulatory Agency. Many other practitioners ended up 'suicided'.
I remember that when it all went down. The FDA also raided the company in Paris that was making the GcMAF. What jurisdiction does our FDA have in France? They systematically shut down the entire manufacturing, distribution, and use of this product as well as the providers that used it. It also sent a huge message to anyone else from even looking into it. As a clinician, it was a huge blow and a wakeup call as to how serious these bastards are at protecting their turf. I have many colleagues in alternative medicine and these events sent some major shockwaves through the community. May they all rest in peace. This is war and it has been war for many years - even centuries. Sadly, most of the public has not realized it. Thanks again for your replies. It is always nice to have intelligent discussion with another - a thing which seems to be getting more rare these days.
Look into the Lucas Trust and its links to new age, theosophy, and Luciferianism. That my friend, is the one world religion. It permeates just about all levels of governments and many religions - even Christianity.
That whole discussion at times seems to me as another distraction. I truly believe that the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Right now Terrain is for the most part, well sounding speculation with little clinical proof. That is not the fault of people promoting this idea - it takes money to do proper research. Therefore, I am not finding fault. But, until I can see more substantial practical bench proven and reproducible science, it remains for me some very intriguing observation that warrant serious study because some of what is presented as fact in Germ Theory is crap. For example, there are some not well known studies that indicate that the premise of disease transmission is flawed. It still needs further investigation. But, that does not mean the baby is thrown out with the bathwater.
If I know anything after years of working in clinical research, it is hardly ever an either or proposition, one way or that way. Our world is more nuanced than simple black and white issues - especially the human body. The only black and white proposition in life is that you are either dead or you are alive - and even those definitions are being screwed with. Everything else is a shade of grey. Picking sides between this or that is not getting to the truth and it is not science; which is more a process of synthesis of empirical data and deriving at conclusions that are not preconceived and biased. Unfortunately, this type of science is rare and more than once got me in trouble. The problem with taking positions is that over time it becomes more an exercise in being right rather than a search for answers to scientific questions. The answers to real scientific inquiry can and do change over time and real science is not deterred by challenges to long held ideas. Power, money, agendas, and egos however, are unwilling and unable to change - no matter which side of a debate is chosen.
Just as a side note that is germane to our previous discussion, Cowen and company also have some questionable affiliations that I am still investigating along the lines of a new age theosophy bent. This spider web of connections is massive - as is the deception of spun lies that infiltrate almost every aspect of our lives. It is hard to find any clarity in any of it - that too is deliberate.
Terrain theory is not nearly as profitable as Germ theory. As a result, it's practiced as an act of faith helping others. It remains relatively corruption free. Prior to the 1900s, when William Rockefeller was still selling snake oil (absolutely true), homeopathic/natural medicine, which subscribes to Terrain theory, was the predominant medical practice by doctors. The American Medical Association was the established in 1869 (if memory is right) in America. It was a subsidiary of its British parent, the British Medical Association. The BMA was responsible for getting the parliament to pass the "Anti-Quack Act", which made homeopathic medicine illegal. The AMA was set to do the same. Their mission was to discredit Terrain theory and to monopolize drugs. William Rockefeller had considerable involvement in this agenda. While he sold a fake cancer cure that some say was nothing more than a laxative and crude oil, he pushed for monopolizing medicine.
The very foundation of Germ Theory was under deceit and plagiarism. It has only grown since then to be a worldwide mafia operation. I prefer Terrain theory because I find honesty there with every one who espouses it. In response to your last part, I am a Christian. Yet, I seldom ever go to church. I don't believe in churches or any of the 501c(3) denominations. I do believe however in studying the Word and practicing my faith. I believe the Amish model of faith is a good model to follow. I believe bible studies where people interact and express their interpretation of verses is far better than a passive congregation that's subject to group think. My point is this. Many people may think because I don't attend church, I am not a good Christian. I am sure some people avoid me as a result. Because there seems to be a prevalence of New Age individuals in homeopathic/ natural medicine doesn't mean their wrong or to be avoided. IMHO, Terrain theory is far more sound than germ theory is.
I'm not really familiar with their religious views. It's that there appears to be cabal/DS retribution because their big plan didn't work out. This seems to be a reoccurring theme. Do you remember all the strange deaths of naturalists, homeopaths, chiropractic, and osteopathic practitioners. This seemed to center around Dr. Bradstreet's treatment of autism using GcMAF. Dr. Bradsteet ended up dead with a shogun wound to his head and chest. They called it a "suicide". CEO Dr. David Noakes company was raided. He was persecuted and jailed for manufacturing GcMAF. British biomedical research scientist Lynda Thyer who has helped many hundreds of patients recover from late-stage cancer in her work with David Noakes at ImmunoBioTech using GcMAF, a naturally occurring protein in the human body and part of the immune system, and who, along with David Noakes, CEO, and nine others has been wrongfully hounded and persecuted in recent times by the MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency), Britain’s Health and Regulatory Agency. Many other practitioners ended up 'suicided'.
I remember that when it all went down. The FDA also raided the company in Paris that was making the GcMAF. What jurisdiction does our FDA have in France? They systematically shut down the entire manufacturing, distribution, and use of this product as well as the providers that used it. It also sent a huge message to anyone else from even looking into it. As a clinician, it was a huge blow and a wakeup call as to how serious these bastards are at protecting their turf. I have many colleagues in alternative medicine and these events sent some major shockwaves through the community. May they all rest in peace. This is war and it has been war for many years - even centuries. Sadly, most of the public has not realized it. Thanks again for your replies. It is always nice to have intelligent discussion with another - a thing which seems to be getting more rare these days.
Look into the Lucas Trust and its links to new age, theosophy, and Luciferianism. That my friend, is the one world religion. It permeates just about all levels of governments and many religions - even Christianity.
Germ theory vs. Terrain theory.
That whole discussion at times seems to me as another distraction. I truly believe that the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Right now Terrain is for the most part, well sounding speculation with little clinical proof. That is not the fault of people promoting this idea - it takes money to do proper research. Therefore, I am not finding fault. But, until I can see more substantial practical bench proven and reproducible science, it remains for me some very intriguing observation that warrant serious study because some of what is presented as fact in Germ Theory is crap. For example, there are some not well known studies that indicate that the premise of disease transmission is flawed. It still needs further investigation. But, that does not mean the baby is thrown out with the bathwater.
If I know anything after years of working in clinical research, it is hardly ever an either or proposition, one way or that way. Our world is more nuanced than simple black and white issues - especially the human body. The only black and white proposition in life is that you are either dead or you are alive - and even those definitions are being screwed with. Everything else is a shade of grey. Picking sides between this or that is not getting to the truth and it is not science; which is more a process of synthesis of empirical data and deriving at conclusions that are not preconceived and biased. Unfortunately, this type of science is rare and more than once got me in trouble. The problem with taking positions is that over time it becomes more an exercise in being right rather than a search for answers to scientific questions. The answers to real scientific inquiry can and do change over time and real science is not deterred by challenges to long held ideas. Power, money, agendas, and egos however, are unwilling and unable to change - no matter which side of a debate is chosen.
Just as a side note that is germane to our previous discussion, Cowen and company also have some questionable affiliations that I am still investigating along the lines of a new age theosophy bent. This spider web of connections is massive - as is the deception of spun lies that infiltrate almost every aspect of our lives. It is hard to find any clarity in any of it - that too is deliberate.
Terrain theory is not nearly as profitable as Germ theory. As a result, it's practiced as an act of faith helping others. It remains relatively corruption free. Prior to the 1900s, when William Rockefeller was still selling snake oil (absolutely true), homeopathic/natural medicine, which subscribes to Terrain theory, was the predominant medical practice by doctors. The American Medical Association was the established in 1869 (if memory is right) in America. It was a subsidiary of its British parent, the British Medical Association. The BMA was responsible for getting the parliament to pass the "Anti-Quack Act", which made homeopathic medicine illegal. The AMA was set to do the same. Their mission was to discredit Terrain theory and to monopolize drugs. William Rockefeller had considerable involvement in this agenda. While he sold a fake cancer cure that some say was nothing more than a laxative and crude oil, he pushed for monopolizing medicine.
The very foundation of Germ Theory was under deceit and plagiarism. It has only grown since then to be a worldwide mafia operation. I prefer Terrain theory because I find honesty there with every one who espouses it. In response to your last part, I am a Christian. Yet, I seldom ever go to church. I don't believe in churches or any of the 501c(3) denominations. I do believe however in studying the Word and practicing my faith. I believe the Amish model of faith is a good model to follow. I believe bible studies where people interact and express their interpretation of verses is far better than a passive congregation that's subject to group think. My point is this. Many people may think because I don't attend church, I am not a good Christian. I am sure some people avoid me as a result. Because there seems to be a prevalence of New Age individuals in homeopathic/ natural medicine doesn't mean their wrong or to be avoided. IMHO, Terrain theory is far more sound than germ theory is.