Apple Tells Support Staff To Remain Silent On iPhone Radiation Concern
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Don't worry apple loves us and always works in our best interest... ?
Having a baby Chernobyl in your pocket blasting 50MB/sec through your nuts is probably harmless....
Sadly, despite all the controversy and gaslighting and bough and paid for "science" about RF radiation and biological impacts, this is still very unknown even though there are well formed studies from years back that demonstrated a definitive connection between cell phone radiating bidirectional microwaves in the proximity of the gonads and a drop in both quantity and quality of sperm. And that was probably 2G at the time.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. The current infertility crisis is no mystery once its understood biological organisms sense and function within the electromagnetic environments they are in. Which are supposed to be native fields.
I will say this as a fact.
I grew up with the number pad key Nokia type phones and my parents had the ol bricks..
Remember the phenomena of PHANTOM VIBRATION?
Doesn’t seem to happen anymore. Maybe more so of a “phantom dulling”
They had to come out and say it was a placebo phsyco reason you’re anticipating the ring.
No way, you would literally feel your leg VIBRATE often times before a call came on!
All of a sudden phones upgrade, no more “Phantoms”! Gee! I guess we are all just used to it they would say..
I heard that the radiation levels only pass tests because they test them on dummies wearing cases on the OUTSIDE of the pocket, often with thicker padding, not tightly tucked up on your leg..
While more study on specifics would be nice, you can pretty much go back to physics, for which they use an oversimplified conception of ionizing radiation vs safe radiation. It's not like that. As you go down in frequency, and thus energy density, the dosage needed to cause certain biological problems increases, even if a single energized particle isn'tenough to cause serious molecular damage. It's not safe just because it won't rend DNA with the minimum possible exposure.
They also did not do requisite safety research for 5G, just like a certain jab. Any of these modern wireless data technologies has human costs and risks, that need to be weighed against their benefits; and the transceivers need to be placed away from humans to an extent based on said never-done research.
That said, the way they're packing data, for 5G, is effectively creating bursts of those nasty high frequencies we're taught to avoid exposure to, except possibly on the low 500-700MHz bands. And 5G UC...just because that DEW can make the next Pokemon Go look like it was rendered on a RTX 4090 doesn't mean it won't slowly cook you.
☝️ This! Spot on. Then have some bluetooth buds embedded in your skull and you complete the picture.
I would hazard a guess that some of these "fools" ALREADY have lost the ability to have their nut sacks analyzed for sperm availability!!!! ProCreate in the future, maybe?????
kek, although 50 MB/sec doesn't happen with 5g. Typical speeds are like 5 to 10 megabytes per second.
I don't see why it wouldn't. 5-10MBps was quite doable on 4G, prior to the 5G rollout.
I don't have 5g so i haven't tested, but the web says:
"In practical scenarios, the average download speeds on 5G networks often range from 50 megabits per second (Mbps) to several hundred Mbps. These speeds are still considerably faster than most 4G LTE networks."