I'm not even a fan of Lin Wood at all. But I believe "flipping" refers to people who actually got indicted, and then were granted immunity. Not witnesses. If the defense doesn't have any reason to call Lin Wood, there's nothing that can stop the prosecution from calling him as a witness. Doesn't necessarily mean anyone "flipped". He wasn't charged and isn't being given immunity for testimony against anyone else.
He also openly called out Pence and Justic R0berts as pedo. If you make such claims and they are false, you are charged with slander and libel, etc. They never went after him for making those claims. Instead they booted him from twit and threatened disbarment so he opted for "retirement". Hmmmmm
From what I remember, Wood was a very vocal supporter of the stolen election, and in Georgia especially (his homestate). In 2020, he was on stage a lot w/ Powell (defendant in same Trump case) adamantly declaring election fraud. He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses. Then took to twitter and dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant. Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill. Days (or maybe hours) later, he was banned on twitter and little was heard from him again. Egregious claims against those 2, IMO, would be punishable by the most extreme slander lawsuits if untrue. The fact that no lawsuits against Wood were filed (to my knowledge) indicates they weren't untrue statements/accusations. They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.
I'm not even a fan of Lin Wood at all. But I believe "flipping" refers to people who actually got indicted, and then were granted immunity. Not witnesses. If the defense doesn't have any reason to call Lin Wood, there's nothing that can stop the prosecution from calling him as a witness. Doesn't necessarily mean anyone "flipped". He wasn't charged and isn't being given immunity for testimony against anyone else.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pro-trump-lawyer-lin-wood-says-he-didn-t-flip-on-former-president-in-georgia/ar-AA1h0UNx
Lin has been calling out the election fraud since day 1 there is no way he is cooperating against him.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of Lin this was obvious
He also openly called out Pence and Justic R0berts as pedo. If you make such claims and they are false, you are charged with slander and libel, etc. They never went after him for making those claims. Instead they booted him from twit and threatened disbarment so he opted for "retirement". Hmmmmm
Ya...can you give me the cliff notes on this? I got taken in by this early on..then...never heard how we figured out it was slander.
From what I remember, Wood was a very vocal supporter of the stolen election, and in Georgia especially (his homestate). In 2020, he was on stage a lot w/ Powell (defendant in same Trump case) adamantly declaring election fraud. He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses. Then took to twitter and dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant. Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill. Days (or maybe hours) later, he was banned on twitter and little was heard from him again. Egregious claims against those 2, IMO, would be punishable by the most extreme slander lawsuits if untrue. The fact that no lawsuits against Wood were filed (to my knowledge) indicates they weren't untrue statements/accusations. They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.
Thats the cliff notes version as I recall, but perhaps other anons on here have add'l goods. Some sauce with that if you'd like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/01/07/lin-wood-lawyer-closely-tied-to-trump-permanently-banned-from-twitter-after-claiming-capitol-siege-was-staged/?sh=76923bab1be3 and https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/01/02/trumps-legal-allies-attack-each-other-after-lin-woods-tweets-wild-conspiracies