From what I remember, Wood was a very vocal supporter of the stolen election, and in Georgia especially (his homestate). In 2020, he was on stage a lot w/ Powell (defendant in same Trump case) adamantly declaring election fraud. He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses. Then took to twitter and dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant. Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill. Days (or maybe hours) later, he was banned on twitter and little was heard from him again. Egregious claims against those 2, IMO, would be punishable by the most extreme slander lawsuits if untrue. The fact that no lawsuits against Wood were filed (to my knowledge) indicates they weren't untrue statements/accusations. They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.
He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses.
This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kenetic Civil War.
That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.
dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant.
As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.
I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the Qanon Shamon, and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.
So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.
Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill.
Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.
I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.
They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.
So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.
He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?
There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.
I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.
But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.
He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?
After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.
Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.
According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.
His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.
Whichever way one looks at it, the fact is, THIS is how intelligence assets work to position themselves into places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.
What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of a personality cult-like worship group?
Very thorough and insightful post fren. For the record, by no means am I fully on board with Wood. Doesn't sound like anyone on this thread is. And with good reason. I've always found him sus. Admired his passion at first, but he went way overboard and at times went from passionate orator to raving lunatic. When he was up on stage in '20 and rallying people to civil war 2.0 I immediately filtered out a lot of his commentary. Thats not the way, for the exact reasons you highlighted.
All in all, I think we see eye-to-eye on Wood. He's more harm than good and highly sus. Definitely not to be trusted. Curious tho for more of your thoughts on Chansley. I always suspected he was a plant given he was at a ton of protests for contrasting causes, the video where he was seemingly "guided" thru the capitol, and the fact that all these J6ers are getting 10-20 years in prison, while I think he got something like 2 or 3 and is already out.
The lads over at DEFECTED talked a bit bout the J6 situation in the context of Operation Truth on their recent episode. (Their episodes are always very long, so you might have to jump around a bit to find it.) https://rumble.com/v3kf7p2-defected-ep-42-sun-900pm-et-.html
According to them, those J6ers are people (e..g proud boys and oath keepers) who actually committed violence, broke things and attacked police, and actually planned and attempted to execute the plan to instigate a civil war. But Chansley is not one of them.
Those proud boys and people getting the severe sentences were actually doing pretty bad things. Some innocent people got caught up in the whole operation, but they also point out that if people actually committed crimes, that's what they are being penalized for.
They have some interesting discussion about all this including the Ray Epps situation. (It appears that Ray Epps, who wasn't actually directly involved like the real insurrectionists, handed himself over to the FBI very soon after J6, and flipped and cooperated by squeeling on all the others who did actually do the stuff on the day.
Defected is a long program, but they usually go through 4 or 5 different topics with lots of good in-depth discussion, so jumping around to find the belt (about 30 minutes) where they talk about operation truth and j6 shouldn't be too hard.
In any case, good chats! Great to get your feedback and to read your comments. wwg1
From what I remember, Wood was a very vocal supporter of the stolen election, and in Georgia especially (his homestate). In 2020, he was on stage a lot w/ Powell (defendant in same Trump case) adamantly declaring election fraud. He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses. Then took to twitter and dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant. Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill. Days (or maybe hours) later, he was banned on twitter and little was heard from him again. Egregious claims against those 2, IMO, would be punishable by the most extreme slander lawsuits if untrue. The fact that no lawsuits against Wood were filed (to my knowledge) indicates they weren't untrue statements/accusations. They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.
Thats the cliff notes version as I recall, but perhaps other anons on here have add'l goods. Some sauce with that if you'd like: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/01/07/lin-wood-lawyer-closely-tied-to-trump-permanently-banned-from-twitter-after-claiming-capitol-siege-was-staged/?sh=76923bab1be3 and https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/01/02/trumps-legal-allies-attack-each-other-after-lin-woods-tweets-wild-conspiracies
This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kenetic Civil War.
That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.
As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.
I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the Qanon Shamon, and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.
So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.
Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.
I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.
So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.
He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?
There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.
I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.
But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.
He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?
After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.
Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.
According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.
His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.
Whichever way one looks at it, the fact is, THIS is how intelligence assets work to position themselves into places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.
What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of a personality cult-like worship group?
Honest question.
wwg1wga
Very thorough and insightful post fren. For the record, by no means am I fully on board with Wood. Doesn't sound like anyone on this thread is. And with good reason. I've always found him sus. Admired his passion at first, but he went way overboard and at times went from passionate orator to raving lunatic. When he was up on stage in '20 and rallying people to civil war 2.0 I immediately filtered out a lot of his commentary. Thats not the way, for the exact reasons you highlighted.
All in all, I think we see eye-to-eye on Wood. He's more harm than good and highly sus. Definitely not to be trusted. Curious tho for more of your thoughts on Chansley. I always suspected he was a plant given he was at a ton of protests for contrasting causes, the video where he was seemingly "guided" thru the capitol, and the fact that all these J6ers are getting 10-20 years in prison, while I think he got something like 2 or 3 and is already out.
The lads over at DEFECTED talked a bit bout the J6 situation in the context of Operation Truth on their recent episode. (Their episodes are always very long, so you might have to jump around a bit to find it.) https://rumble.com/v3kf7p2-defected-ep-42-sun-900pm-et-.html
According to them, those J6ers are people (e..g proud boys and oath keepers) who actually committed violence, broke things and attacked police, and actually planned and attempted to execute the plan to instigate a civil war. But Chansley is not one of them.
Those proud boys and people getting the severe sentences were actually doing pretty bad things. Some innocent people got caught up in the whole operation, but they also point out that if people actually committed crimes, that's what they are being penalized for.
They have some interesting discussion about all this including the Ray Epps situation. (It appears that Ray Epps, who wasn't actually directly involved like the real insurrectionists, handed himself over to the FBI very soon after J6, and flipped and cooperated by squeeling on all the others who did actually do the stuff on the day.
Defected is a long program, but they usually go through 4 or 5 different topics with lots of good in-depth discussion, so jumping around to find the belt (about 30 minutes) where they talk about operation truth and j6 shouldn't be too hard.
In any case, good chats! Great to get your feedback and to read your comments. wwg1
Likewise fren!