141 The vaccinated are now classified as transhumans per the government (twitter.com) posted 1 year ago by 2000mules 1 year ago by 2000mules +143 / -2 43 comments share 43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-mrna-human/fact-check-2013-u-s-supreme-court-judgement-did-not-rule-that-people-inoculated-with-mrna-vaccines-are-no-longer-human-idUSL1N2UF1VK
I can find the case 12-398 1b7d but I cannot find the opinion. Will keep looking.
Transcript of court case argument: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/12-398_h3dj.pdf
UPDATE: opinions of the court for this case, I haven't read it yet: https://web.archive.org/web/20210701182721/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2gZBC0ZRg9m7CaJ1-Y36eJ2vgEeqiW2VqESnoVE8ETR3JuePvPkF3RiIY
https://web.archive.org/web/20210701182721/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Why you linking this to Facebook? Remove this part in the future to prevent that-
?fbclid=IwAR2gZBC0ZRg9m7CaJ1-Y36eJ2vgEeqiW2VqESnoVE8ETR3JuePvPkF3RiIY
just copied what was on wayback, the stuff after the ? was the source of the original request ... there were many there, I grabbed a random one.
I just reread what I wrote.
Please don't take my comment as an accusation you did that on purpose.
Just as a friendly reminder, anything that comes after the ? in those URLs is a tracking code & can be traced. Very few (relatively speaking) are aware of this.
Fact checking = censorship
that's why you gotta keep digging! never trust the fact checkers
Thank you!
THIS is the link he is trying to get you to go to, BUT, you have to go there manually, one step at a time, not just jump to it whole link....
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/12-398_h3dj.pdf
The Case is from 2012, NOT NEWER....
It's the one at the top of the list....
Looking for the OPINIONS PDF, under OPINIONS, 2012 and 2013....
ALL or Any part of this should be in there somewhere....
OOF, went through lots of PDF Table of Cases, aka Table of Contents, found nothing....
Reran a search and found THIS, and within this link is the Opnions::
Read it for yourselves, I refuse to read this to confirm or deny any of it for anyone....
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/
Read it. It doesn't say any of that.