It's is really not a difficult concept. There is a difference between not understanding a concept and not seeing it's hypothesis as so irrefutable that there is no need for further discussion, period.

You can not have head fakes, kayfabe and ammunition spent by the Cabal out of fear of military action alongside a locked in, hard baked timeline for that action. If you are so sure of this timeline then so is the Cabal and all the fakery is for naught.

Your hypothesis presupposes that even if the conditions for victory are met in a chaotic preference cascade, the white hats will keep the "show" going to satisfy the previously stated timeline.

I am not on here datefagging apart from a few jokes, making "hAbBeNiNg" posts, nor advocating anything other than healthy skepticism.

Future proves Past, remember, not the other way around.

Traditionally, how well has predicting the future from Q drops transpired for those who took a crack? Was Q just shooting some shit with these gems?

"Disinformation is necessary."

"This is not another four year election."

I find that, during this time of ubiquitous uncertainty, the sheer certainty of many pundits that the a fore mentioned timeline is gospel produces an almost a priori, skeptical response from me.