Elon Musk: The “Election Integrity” Team that was undermining election are gone
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Because I think people are wrong about Elon and Twitter? You haven't accidentally pinned all your hopes on one corporation and individual, have you?
People on this board act like a savior is going to come out of the sky and rescue America. Worse, they act like the smallest amount of rational thinking might prevent it.
Good luck with all that.
Nothing wrong with thinking people are wrong about Elon and Twitter. It's contrasting views and perspectives that increase the collective thinking power.
But your take is, in my opinion (just an opinion), decidedly negative in approach. HOW we look at things, and with what mindset we look at things, directly influences WHAT we actually see, imo.
So, let's go: No, I very much most certainly have NOT pinned ALL my hopes on (kekekeke Seriously?) one corporation or one individual. I observe what is going on in the world, not just by one or even hundreds of individuals, but by observing those and the whole collective, the flow and ebb of culture, information, actions and narratives. My hope and trust are firmly rooted in my beliefs and experiences with God, and I interpret the information that comes in using multiple frameworks. What makes the most sense? What empowers me the most to be able to take action, to be effective? What resonates with that inner compass that has guided me my whole life and which, in my estimation, has borne great fruits and blessings? (Because faith should always be rooted in experience, and not merely a conceptualization that is used to depress more difficult thoughts.)
I guess the "he just sort of side steps any responsibility for failing everyone every single time." seems kind of .... generalistic and nego to me. every single time?
I'm not really too worried about who Elon is, where he comes from, or his corporate management behavior. The things I AM most interested in are the net effects of his actions over the past two years. The EFFECT of what he has been doing at Twitter has been massively in the plus side for Q and the patriots, and for the general waking of millions out of the matrix of lies. Regardless of WHY he is doing that, the net results are beneficial, as far as I can see, to the causes I believe in. And, to be frank, based on those net results, I don't think see the logic or reasons to conclude that he's acting for destructive or selfish reasons.
Yes, there are some who may have the "savior is going to come out of the sky and rescue America" perspective, but far more have the view that it is we, it is every person and every community, that is what will make the difference. To increase our awareness, to understand what others are doing on all the different levels of activity that impact on us, and to be able to make proactive and conscious choices as to HOW we engage and what impact we make, in our own lives on our own micro levels.
If you think you grasp things better, and you think you have solutions, then perhaps you might share them. (But personally, I would consider the possibility that the negativity you are seeing is what your projecting out from your own internal processes, but that's probably a big leap....?)
In any case, if one chooses to make the effort, each of us can make a contribution that aids and helps the macro. It doesn't necessarily require agreement on opinion, simply agreement on intent or purpose.
Well.. you see your role as choosing "the macro" you like and perhaps go about supporting it rather uncritically. It seems that as long as it currently makes you happy, you spare no thoughts for the future, or where it may end up leading you. This triggers my instincts to deliver genuine caution.
You write a lot about influence, and awareness, and alignment. I get that a lot of people see this forum as a place to do that. To the extent that they're willing to straight up attempt to bully someone who, in a few short sentences, simply disagrees with one particular narrative being built.
I do not see this forum the same. I think your ability to influence and broadcast and align on this forum are essentially zero. Which is not a negative opinion at all.. in particular, I feel this makes this forum the best place to air disagreements and to challenge narratives and am always surprised when people react so vehemently as you and another poster did.
Please go back and critically evaluate the post I was replying to. Do you honestly feel that my words in response to it merited any of this? Was the original post truly something worthy of this level of effortful defense? Could it not, honestly, have withstood some temperament?
Thanks for sharing you opinion. Have a nice day.