Thanks for the link. That was a really cool article.
I don't think it made a convincing argument against a female president, though. Much of it was based on things that happened with monarchs 400-500 years ago. It really can't compare to modern day women in a democracy.
There are many countries with female rulers today that are not war prone. Anyway, looking at what male presidents have done, it's not like they went screaming away from war and conflict.
Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states that we have a REPUBLICAN form of government, not a democracy.
A democracy is MOB rule where the minority does not have a voice.
Female president = failed nation. God would not approve.
Why would God not approve of a female president?
Not giving any credence to the comment about God, but I do remember reading that female rulers are more likely to cause conflict or get into a war.
https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men
Thanks for the link. That was a really cool article.
I don't think it made a convincing argument against a female president, though. Much of it was based on things that happened with monarchs 400-500 years ago. It really can't compare to modern day women in a democracy.
There are many countries with female rulers today that are not war prone. Anyway, looking at what male presidents have done, it's not like they went screaming away from war and conflict.
Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states that we have a REPUBLICAN form of government, not a democracy. A democracy is MOB rule where the minority does not have a voice.