Please don't shoot me but this could "backfire" the first time a woman gets pumped full of lead running out the door with her arms full of diapers and formula.
What about mistakes? "I THOUGHT she was heading out the door with the coats, but she was just heading over to shop for scarves. Oops!"
We're the side that says punishment should fit the crime. So: ARMED robbery? Any kind of weapon at all? Eat lead, you're dead. Simple unarmed shoplifting? Not so much. Not chopping off your hands like islamic barbarians, either. (No, you don't get the stuff for free; and you do time for doing crime.)
Trump didn't say with WHAT you should get shot—blast unarmed looters with something non-lethal, like rubber bullets, tasers, etc! Avoid wrongful death, excessive use of force, and business-crippling lawsuits. Just a thought
The threat of being shot is a huge deterrent to crime. Not to mention that the DS has forced people into desperate situations where they do crimes just to survive.
The threat of being shot is a huge deterrent to crime. Not to mention that the DS has forced people into desperate situations where they do crimes just to survive.
Those two sentences are fighting each other.
The DS is forcing people to steal just to survive. So, to we really want to kill them for that?
Online executioners are screaming YES! But advocating execution for petty theft IMHO is not having the punishment fit the crime, which makes it an indefensible position.
You loot, we shoot!
AND NO PROSECUTION FOR SHOOTING THE IDIOT BY DA's who can't follow the law!!!!!!!!!
That's where the 2A is being subverted
Along a more specific line of FAFO.
Try that in any town with balls.
Please don't shoot me but this could "backfire" the first time a woman gets pumped full of lead running out the door with her arms full of diapers and formula.
What about mistakes? "I THOUGHT she was heading out the door with the coats, but she was just heading over to shop for scarves. Oops!"
We're the side that says punishment should fit the crime. So: ARMED robbery? Any kind of weapon at all? Eat lead, you're dead. Simple unarmed shoplifting? Not so much. Not chopping off your hands like islamic barbarians, either. (No, you don't get the stuff for free; and you do time for doing crime.)
Trump didn't say with WHAT you should get shot—blast unarmed looters with something non-lethal, like rubber bullets, tasers, etc! Avoid wrongful death, excessive use of force, and business-crippling lawsuits. Just a thought
The threat of being shot is a huge deterrent to crime. Not to mention that the DS has forced people into desperate situations where they do crimes just to survive.
Those two sentences are fighting each other.
The DS is forcing people to steal just to survive. So, to we really want to kill them for that?
Online executioners are screaming YES! But advocating execution for petty theft IMHO is not having the punishment fit the crime, which makes it an indefensible position.
Dead men tell no tales. If your gonna shoot then shoot to kill.
If not I'd use mace. Big ol can of bear mace lol.
Context matters.
Exactly