https://www.wmur.com/article/kennedy-abortion-gun-control-nuclear-power/44273836

He has gone back and forth on gun control. It depends on who asks him. He's consistent in saying he doesn't want to take guns away, but he waffles on gun control laws.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4072813-rfk-jr-argues-gun-control-cannot-meaningfully-reduce-gun-violence/

Kennedy said that he would get behind a bipartisan assault weapons ban, which the overwhelming majority of Democrats support,

And?

Here you go: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/18/us/robert-kennedy-jr-admits-he-is-guilty-in-possessing-heroin.html

Maybe you can share why you’re able to use the computer but can’t research yourself?

It was all over the news when it happened.

These are things he's said. What do you want, him to personally make a blood vow to you that he means them?

You ask for the sauce, and when someone goes to the trouble of whipping some up for you, you go, eh, I don't like this sauce. Make me some more.

These are the three biggest voting points for presidential candidates right now. You think RFK Jr. is going to just sit back and let the MSM lie about these voting topics without making a stink?

He probably has his answers to these questions on his campaign page. Or on his blog. Or his twitter account. Or hell, in some of the books he's written on the subject. And if you don't trust what he says on his campaign page and his blog, and on twitter, and in his books, go look up videos of town halls and interviews he's done about them. And then, you know, watch the videos.

And just because he says that people are using climate change to try to control people doesn't mean he thinks climate change is fake. He wants to impose all sorts of laws and fines on certain businesses because he thinks they're leading to climate change. Did you even bother to read the article you linked? Because in that very article, he says:

First of all, let me just say this about climate, I believe that carbon in the atmosphere and methane does increase warming. Look around, you can see it everywhere. Ice caps are melting, etc. The Greenland ice sheet, I spent a lot of time outdoors, and I see that. over 69 years, I’ve seen the changes. And I’ve seen them — the mass migration of animals, of southern animals like black vultures, the northern increase in their ranges. I’ve kept track since I was a kid about when the leaves turn, and it steadily moved up each year.

And why can't you look this stuff up yourself? Do you not know how to?

I honestly would like to know why you can't figure out how to look up something as easy as a presidential candidate's stances on the three most controversial topics right now. Which means the three most discussed topics and a man who has gotten a ton of coverage. He's a Kennedy, for crying out loud. He's lived his entire life in the public eye. It's not like he's Joe Blow from some podunk place no one has ever heard of. He's a public figure. But you couldn't find any of this info on him yourself?

What exactly did you do to find these answers for yourself before you started treating people here like they're your personal secretaries? Walk me through the steps you took before you gave up on searching for things yourself.

Because I have to wonder at the utter incompetence of someone who can't find any info on this stuff without asking others to do it for them. You should have come across some of it just by NOT living under a rock the past few years.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/flashback-robert-f-kennedy-jr-once-called-for-koch-industries-and-exxonmobil-to-be-put-to-corporate-death

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know. It's from the mocking bird media. But they sourced it from one of his own blogs, so you can go look for his blog to get your sauce for the sauce. It will be good practice for you, I think, to look up something all by yourself like a big boy.

Kennedy, a controversial environmental lawyer whose résumé includes work for the Natural Resources Defense Council and waterway preservation group Waterkeeper Alliance, argued in a 2014 blog post that big oil companies, including Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, "should be given the death penalty." The post, titled, "Jailing Climate Deniers," was a response to claims made at the time that Kennedy said "all climate deniers should be jailed." He denied ever saying such a thing, writing, "I support the First Amendment which makes room for any citizen to, even knowingly, spew far more vile lies without legal consequence.""I do, however, believe that corporations which deliberately, purposefully, maliciously and systematically sponsor climate lies should be given the death penalty," Kennedy wrote for EcoWatch. He named Koch Industries and ExxonMobil as the supervillains behind "a successful multimillion dollar propaganda blitz to mislead the public about global warming using the same techniques honed by Big Tobacco in its campaign to hoodwink the public about smoking." "Laws in every state maintain that companies that fail to comply with prescribed standards of corporate behavior may be either dissolved or, in the case of foreign corporations, lose their rights to operate within that state's borders. These rules can be quite expansive and, in contrast to the U.S. Supreme Court's ­­­­recent rulings on campaign finance law, companies, under state laws, enjoy far less protection than human beings," he argued. Kennedy suggested that a state attorney general "with the will, resolve and to stand to up to the dangerous and duplicitous corporate propagandists" could not only annul the corporate charters of businesses that dispute climate change, but also nonprofit conservative groups, including the Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Still, Kennedy was undeterred. As recently as 2016, he urged then-state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to ban ExxonMobil from doing business in New York for allegedly misleading the public about climate change, according to a memo reported by the New York Post in 2018.