You say EPA has, this year, revised acceptable levels of PFAS in water down to parts per billion, what I just read says: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets healthy advisory levels for PFOA and PFOS — two common types of PFAS — at 70 parts per trillion.
If PPB was undetectable, PPT is way undetectable.
Wonder how their going to police this with people that have wells, like me.
EPA, FDA, all the bullcrap gov agencies are total control freaks. So we should worry about small incidental intake of PFAS, but push on society the injection of untested mRNA jab that has kills millions of people already. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
PPT, you're right of course -- way undetectable indeed.
I've been watching this campaign unfold (be paid for) for about 9 months and wondered where it was going. This WEF vid is a good possible explanation.
PFAS is in the stage where a mass of explainer articles ("What You Need to Know about PFAS") are slowly but steadily being seeded to low-information outlets.
If you can stomach the patronizing Karen tone, the videos embedded in these two pages give a good idea of the stance ("be very concerned" ... "It's going to be very expensive.")
Never even heard of PFAS. Thanks for the tip off.
You say EPA has, this year, revised acceptable levels of PFAS in water down to parts per billion, what I just read says: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets healthy advisory levels for PFOA and PFOS — two common types of PFAS — at 70 parts per trillion.
If PPB was undetectable, PPT is way undetectable.
Wonder how their going to police this with people that have wells, like me.
EPA, FDA, all the bullcrap gov agencies are total control freaks. So we should worry about small incidental intake of PFAS, but push on society the injection of untested mRNA jab that has kills millions of people already. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
PPT, you're right of course -- way undetectable indeed.
I've been watching this campaign unfold (be paid for) for about 9 months and wondered where it was going. This WEF vid is a good possible explanation.
PFAS is in the stage where a mass of explainer articles ("What You Need to Know about PFAS") are slowly but steadily being seeded to low-information outlets.
If you can stomach the patronizing Karen tone, the videos embedded in these two pages give a good idea of the stance ("be very concerned" ... "It's going to be very expensive.")
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/14/health/pfas-water-filters-wellness/index.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/wis-to-better-understand-scope-of-pfas-contamination-in-drinking-water-by-2024/ar-AA1gXYnu
I like to run a news search in PFAS every so often and see where the narrative's at and who's running headlines.