For those of you who may be new to this, CISA, the Surgeon General, the White House, the FBI and the CDC are BARRED from communicating with social media platforms for the purposes of censorship of any kind. The original 5th opinion omitted CISA - the states appealed and this is the NEW decision, including them.
You’ll need to go to my pinned thread ASAP and read through. This is the most important civil liberties case in our lifetimes.
Under the 5th Circuit's preliminary injunction, CISA:
"shall take no actions, formal or informal, directly or indirectly, to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce, including through altering their algorithms, posted social-media content containing protected free speech. That includes, but is not limited to, compelling the platforms to act, such as by intimating that some form of punishment will follow a failure to comply with any request, or supervising, directing, or otherwise meaningfully controlling the social-media companies’ decision-making processes."
Tracy Beans explains it - Excellent news:
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1709287462390976773
For those of you who may be new to this, CISA, the Surgeon General, the White House, the FBI and the CDC are BARRED from communicating with social media platforms for the purposes of censorship of any kind. The original 5th opinion omitted CISA - the states appealed and this is the NEW decision, including them.
You’ll need to go to my pinned thread ASAP and read through. This is the most important civil liberties case in our lifetimes.
Yep, I saw somebody on Twitter comment that this is more important than anything going on in the House right now.
CISA is basically the democrat propaganda arm of the federal government.
Absolutely
Yaaaaaaaaah!
sticky please
What are you saying? That's not what the article says. It says Cisa walks free. Wheres the free win?
Under the 5th Circuit's preliminary injunction, CISA:
"shall take no actions, formal or informal, directly or indirectly, to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce, including through altering their algorithms, posted social-media content containing protected free speech. That includes, but is not limited to, compelling the platforms to act, such as by intimating that some form of punishment will follow a failure to comply with any request, or supervising, directing, or otherwise meaningfully controlling the social-media companies’ decision-making processes."
Thank you
Har. Lol