In honor of Indigenous Peoples' Day
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Native Americans my ass.
They just made another discovery of ancient remains that is dated to 20 or 21 thousands years ago. Some of the remains found dated at around 13 to 14 thousand years ago are Caucasian. It is likely those "native Americans' wiped out the first inhabitants of north America. Even those they wiped out may not have been the native Americans.
This earth is older than we know, and more civilizations have come and gone than what we have been taught.
So because you’re an evolutionist that believes that Caucasians were here before “Indigenous People”, do you believe that the massacres that thousands of tribes endured (that Maui is now facing) didn’t happen? Were meaningless? A conspiracy theory? Or somehow they’re all evil dumbasses because they bring up their very real history on Columbus day? Are those Caucasians you believe were here prior to them more important somehow? My ass.
Where’s your sauce on this?
Google Kenniwick Man, and there are several others. Those "native Americans" sued to get the Kenniwick Man remains so that they could 'repatriate' them. He wasn't an Indian, but the Clinton Administration gave them the remains even in the face of all the scientists and facts. They destroyed the evidence. After we wouldn't want a good con being exposed.
This Smithsonian article says the skeleton you name was of Japanese, or Polynesian decent. Not Caucasian, like you’ve claimed.
Also, the “natives” didn’t bury or “repatriate” the remains like you claim either. They lost the lawsuit to a group of scientists, headed by a man named Owsley that won some of the remains to study. Some remain with the Corp. None went to the “natives”.
Interestingly enough, Owsley “helped reassemble and identify the dismembered and burned bodies from the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. Later, he did the same with the Pentagon victims of the 9/11 terrorist attack.”
A little sus, nonetheless according to you, better in his Caucasian hands than of the “natives” you so eagerly mock & detest.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/kennewick-man-finally-freed-share-his-secrets-180952462/
I was born in America, and grew up in America. So did my parents, and both their parents. I'm native American.
When people speak of indigenous Americans... I don't care. As mentioned, civilizations have come and gone. No known tribe of indigenous Americans is likely the true original inheritor of any given land in America. The British aren't the original inhabiting bloodline of Britain. Neither are the Canadians, Australians, Japanese, Chinese, Mexicans, or probably most anyone.
And for anyone that is, somehow? I still don't care. Each man and woman must make the best of what he or she has. Are you disadvantaged because of what people in the past did? Not likely, but if you are, then welcome to the human being club. Everyone has a weakness, infirmity, stigma, or some other disadvantage in life. Your people had mathematicians and doctors and religions and invented things? So did everyone else's. Now it's your turn; invent something, heal someone, grow in spirituality, apply logical reasoning to your judgment.
Just because some IDIOTS online ignore the Maui massacre because it’s being heavily censored by the ftard legacy media doesn’t mean that the massacre that happened to the Native Americans that were on this land in Columbus’s era didn’t happen. Or just bc you’re a little mad at them bc their ancestors got here before yours did, doesn’t mean that all “Native Americans” are ftard liberals. Not all of them think they’re better than you just because they want their lives, cultures, languages & lands preserved.
Ummm, Native American land WAS stolen by the globalist colonials, INCLUDING Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii. All facts and criminal, regardless of who is saying it, when or why.
Yes - my point with the meme is trying to point out the hypocrisy of those who virtue signal about atrocities that happened hundreds of years ago, but then aren't as vocal about the atrocity that's happening right now.
May it be because it’s being HEAVILY CENSORED? Not all sheep are evil, they’re just not awake, YET. This is information warfare. Don’t assume that everyone who doesn’t know everything you know is an idiot.
[Climbs on soapbox; clears throat]
Ahem.
I think that indigenous people's day is racist - verging on the NAzi ideology of purity.
What happens if one can claim multiple ethnicities? I know there is a meme of mutt - of race-mixing - which is portrayed as somehow dirty. But TBH it is a load of cobblers.
A simple, public figure example is Winston Peters in New Zealand, who has a Maori parent and an Anglo/white one. He is dead-set against any plan to feather one race's nest, because it is just plain silly to deny the other parent's ancestry. Also he cannot be accused of being a white supremacist, even as some people try.
So for some other examples, I know someone who is Dutch and Scottish/Norman but also has a Khoisan/Bushman ancestor. I know another who is Korean and Raratongan, was brought up by Anglos and jokes about being Asian in a Kiwi accent. Scandalous! What about the person who can trace their ancestry to Genghis Khan, but in the process of time has become a proud Frisian? In New Zealand, we often encounter Scottish or Irish even Dutch Maoris. They have Anglophone names, unless they are radicalized and convert it to a Maori one. Do we reject these products of race-mixing?
I know that the virtue signalers use a weenie drop of ancestry to claim legitimacy (think of Pocahontas Warren), but all of us have ancestors. Even if we cannot trace each line, those ancestors come from all over the globe. So the whole exercise of recognizing indigenous peoples becomes meaningless. People moved around, since the beginning of time. They had offspring. Each and every one of us has a story there. I think the results from supposed "DNA ancestry tests" can show that conclusively, however.
The funniest of this sort of example is the Brits, who have had waves of people coming to their Islands. Romans (who were from all over the Empire, so could have been Eastern European or even Namibian), Vikings, Angles, Saxons, and Normans (Frankified Vikings) to name but a few. There are Irish people with Spanish ancestors, from when men washed ashore after the Armada debacle. I know of Dutch people who have Georgian ancestors - when there was a famine in the Caucasus, people walked across Europe and landed in the fertile land of milk and honey.
Do we now have to recite all our ancestors, and pass a purity test by eliminating those people who are not pure, before we do anything? Oh let's do recognize ALL the minorities. LOL - that's everyone. Also, can we go back to a home country and claim all that land back, now? I think not. Otherwise one's ancestry is actually quite boring dinner conversation.
Columbus day it is then,
The point of Columbus day is to remember one person, and his crew/ships. It is about (re-)discovering the American continent by Europeans. In other words, it is an important event in the country's history.
The day is not about celebrating anyone's special ancestors.
Lief Ericsson day it is then.
I know right? What about Tartarians and Clovis people?
I'm 1/2 Swedish so I will have to stay with this.
Kek
It’s also important to celebrate the first Americans and their culture that are a proud part of US history as well.
Indeed, and how far back shall we go. But there was Thanksgiving, before.
Recognizing the culture of indigenous people is important history to teach our children and the tyranny that happened to these people on their land is vital for Americans to understand.
Indigenous people aren’t mixed muts. They have languages, were mathematicians, farmers, astronomers, scientists, healers. There’s a lot to learn there, remember and celebrate. Much of this has been forcibly forgotten and that’s sad and very devastating to them.
Columbus introduced the Americas to our European culture, but he did not “discover” the Americas. There were people here living and thriving before Europeans came over with illness, rape and their globalist pursuits of gold and land.
I’m a conservative that thinks that Columbus was an opportunist and some might say rapist. I don’t think there’s much to celebrate about that guy.
Wow. I did not say he discovered. I said he re-discovered. I am aware of people already being there. And I am aware of the whole Columbus Day power struggle.
I firmly believe we should teach our children about ALL our ancestors, and I am against NOT teaching History (or it being replaced with agenda-driven news-article searches, as I have witnessed in schools). At least one should foster a passion for how it all went down, for one's offspring. Some of that can be done via statues and public art, so that one can talk about that person, or event, to one's offspring. The 'ole word-of-mouth. So I also disagree with pulling down statues, and replacing them with soulless blocks of stupid.
Certainly Columbus was an opportunist. In those days one had to be, to get the attention of Royalty and to then go ahead and complete the adventure. Just as influencers today raise money to do stuff and travel. All of them are opportunists. He had things wrong too. Called the people he encountered Indians, because he thought he had found India.
I also abhor tyranny, but guess what? Children are born to parents from both sides of the supposed conflict. This is love, not tyranny. People will procreate, and if one is to claim that some children are better than others, then I am not in agreement.
In defense of mixed mutts: that was my whole point: many people have ancestors from multiple races. Are they not indigenous, if they are born in the land? Is there a certain percentage one needs to claim, before getting recognized as having indigenous status? Or are those kids to be discarded as 'not real'? And what would happen to people whose ancestors came from a land 300 years ago and pioneered in some far away country. Do they have to go back to where their forefathers lived? What arrogance. My other point, was that some people cannot choose sides, because they have feet in both artificial 'camps', even as they are passionate about the land they live in.
No, we learn about our European, African and Indigenous ancestors in American history books now. Although unfortunately, Wit & Wisdom is skewing that a lot atm. According to your boring, droning word dumps, “the whole exercise of recognizing indigenous peoples is meaningless.” Your whole soapbox rant is meaningless and I heavily disagree. It’s obvious that you love hearing yourself speak. ALL people deserve a say, a culture, a history and a chance to preserve it — if they can. Don’t come on here saying racist trash and not expect a complete smack down.
So, despite your semi-troll post, accusing me of things, I shall answer.
It is my belief that talking about this touchy subject is better than not, and I am here for the debate.
My point is that one can accuse anyone of racism as soon as there is talk about race, because we all got one, babe - so that makes the word racism apply to every individual on earth, and that is the definition of meaningless - BTW.
The word 'indigenous' is the most racist of all. Indigenous to what? Prove to me that such-and-such 'tribe' did not migrate at some point. There is, apparently, cause for ethnic cleansing and war strafing, if people have only been 'there' 400 years or so (think: Ukraine, Northern Ireland, Falklands etc.). Are people considered to have been 'always there' when their ancestors were provably there 2000 years ago? Apparently not., given the ethnic cleansing of Semites in Palestine, currently, but also Welsh, Scots, Gaelic people, and anyone disagreeing with the Crown. Those 'others' are nothing more than animals, and should be sold off as slaves (I think NAZiz said 'rats').
Notice that people in Britain, Holland or Scandinavia are never considered indigenous. So, the word, kind of means 'brown'. Definitely not white or even any kind of yellowish shade - (hum. Is that not racist - I am confusion). Mind you, the Khoi San in Africa have some of the oldest DNA in the world, and they had pale mocha-yellow skin, and slanty eyes, compared to their neighbors, but are DNA-wise were closely linked to seafaring tribes in Northern Japan 10 000 years ago - and they were largely wiped out, because not black, or tall enough, or just tiny, BTW.
But guess what? Here's the really triggering bit: Those people with San DNA surviving now, were the ones hiding in the ex-Dutch farms in the hinterland. An inconvenient truth - that Indigenous San DNA shows up in SA wypepo. Same story applies for Moriori people in New Zealand. Their descendants are whitish looking, even though they have indigenous ancestors. Also, the Moriori find it very hard negotiating, when faced with the dominant Tainui tribe, because their whole social system was about retreating, and hiding from the cannibals.
So that is my whole point - the whole racism and indigenous awareness thing is tribalism in drag.
Wake UP.
Also, being indigenous, is kind of like being 'pure' or achieving 'unobtainium' - so many people are sidelined just because of a mixed race marriage in their past - half something, or quarter something (or how fine do we need to slice this? 1/32nd or maybe 1/64th, A drop? Ok then, I claim Han Chinese, and some Georgian-Russian too, and Frisian, and a dose of knight-in-armour German Royalty). Can't u see that the whole indigenous ideology is @-ed?
LOL that you think I like hearing myself, and accuse me of being racist to boot.
We are adults, reading and writing, here.
You no likee? Click on somethin' else. Be rude again and I will block.
Top KEK of the day,
Mmmmkay
I thought it was Indignant People's Day.
EFF Columbus Day, the rapist colonists & the globalists that stole Hawaii & blew up Lahaina. Same same.