They've given up on disarmament, at least on a national level. The cities are the most restrictive with gun laws and that's intentional. You'll be outgunned in close quarters.
They have now decided on mutually assured destruction. They want you to use your second amendment rights and react violently, so they kept pushing and pushing inexplicable nonsense on us.
No, your point makes it clear [they] HAVEN'T given up on national firearm disarmament. It starts with the cities and counties. And if [they] think any kind of terroristattacks will be successful in this country, then I say let's get this party started finally
They've given up on disarmament, at least on a national level. The cities are the most restrictive with gun laws and that's intentional. You'll be outgunned in close quarters.
They have now decided on mutually assured destruction. They want you to use your second amendment rights and react violently, so they kept pushing and pushing inexplicable nonsense on us.
No, your point makes it clear [they] HAVEN'T given up on national firearm disarmament. It starts with the cities and counties. And if [they] think any kind of terroristattacks will be successful in this country, then I say let's get this party started finally
Given up is the wrong terminology.
They'll continue to try but realistically the goal of warfare with the citizens is much more attainable.
Because both sides will be willing...more than willing participants.