You can argue that the Balfour Declaration was not the origins of Israel but it was the final clincher.

I appreciate what you're saying, but the "final clincher" was really the creation of the State of Israel by the United Nations. That couldn't have happened without the forced emigration into Israel from Europe by the "Nazis" (which was aided by the closed borders of all other nations to the Jews, and economic incentives to promote moving to Palestine), and of course the creation of the United Nations itself, both of which were primary functions of both WWI and WWII.

The Balfour Declaration certainly has it's place of note, but it was just one step in the chain. I agree it was an important event, I suggest it was not the most important event in the creation of the State of Israel. It's importance is really in it's brevity and content, i.e. it is something that is easy to show to the public that suggests a broader fuckery.

If you remember your Lawrence of Arabia

T.E. Lawrence was a controlled opposition agent, a spy. Believing the propaganda about him from the movie is exactly what you are supposed to believe. The evidence suggests the entire event was orchestrated, controlled on all sides. Nothing was left to chance. No one was acting towards the agenda that history, or their "biography" portrays.

I suggest the best lens to look through history is to take what actually happened as an outcome, then work backwards to see who created that outcome, and see who funded them. For example, what actually happened after WWII was the United Nations was created, Israel was created, and the Cold War was created. You need to dig deep into who was responsible for the creation of these things. Look at their family connections, their job connections, their other work for The Trust (the word I use in my report about Rockefeller et al). Recognize that everyone was an aristocrat, all related to each other, both by family and by monetary obligation. This is the case even for those who "history" reports as "coming from humble beginnings".

A deeper investigation into everyone involved in any event of note for the past few centuries returns a result that suggests an orchestration so detailed it boggles imagination. It is the level of control of all sides, and the rejection the mind demands to cope with the possibility of everything being controlled opposition, which is exactly how it has remained hidden for so long. That and of course us being strongly encouraged to not look at anything that suggests "a conspiracy."