And there is no problem with using it against military forces, fren. (read the whole article)

You don't mention the fire bombing of Tokyo, which hardly ever gets mention. The reason for the use was primarily that only area effect weapons would be effective, since the intervening crosswinds prevented any accuracy of bombing. Tokyo, as the center of government, was an indisputable military target, a key one.

And so were Hiroshima and Nagasaki, if you bother to read the history of the target selection Nagasaki was the reserve target, as their original target was under adverse weather conditions.

I'm a quarter German and plenty of German civilians were killed collaterally with the European bombing campaign. That's what happens when the aggressor begins with bombing civilians. You seem to believe in this fiction of "innocent civilians" inhabiting the aggressor's country. They countenanced the war and all that came from it. They could have kept the peace---but they decided to subscribe to be led and governed by a suicidal terrorist movement, so this is what comes down on their heads. As with the Germans. As with the Japanese.

I'll turn it around. Seems killing peaceful Israelis doesn't bother you. I wonder why.