Searching the Q-drops (please correct me if I am wrong) I see no mention of Israel and 9/11 together at all.
I think, at this point, there is a high order of probability that Israel has been left to last in order to "show the people". Show the people what?
The last head of the Hydra, the Khazarian Mafia in Israel, which is intimately entwined with 9/11, as it thrashes around, trying desperately to maintain control of the narrative and situation.
We are watching in real time, as one of the primary forces behind 9/11, performs another such attack on it's own people in order to sway public attention/opinion, gain an unlimited mandate for war, and somehow stop the bankrupting of the Cabal by having money thrown hand over fist at them by the world community.
If the nation state of Israel, commandeered by the KM can be shown in real time to be actively engaged in such acts against it's own people, then it is a short journey for the normie mind to realizing this same entity, in conjunction with the US three letter agencies, was behind 9/11.
The similarities between this event and 9/11 are many and the IDF has gone from clueless to having a plethora of targeting coordinates in short order and onto a total war footing.
Then you have this Gem (drop 2337)
The question for me is "how much (control) has been exerted" and what percentage of the footage we are seeing is kabuki theatre ?
Edit:- Check out what is returned when you type the string (293476669283001) from drop 2337 into google books. It returns the phone book of Great Awakening topics.
https://www.google.com/search?q=293476669283001&tbm=bks&sca_esv=573410230
Note:- I do not use google for anything, except providing the above results.
Without getting to deep, Biblically, the Jews are left for last because in the Old Testament Stephen and many other prophets were trying to tell the Jews that Jesus is their messiah but they did not believe. So Stephen was the first prophet to die by being stoned to death. Then God said he would go to the gentiles to make the Jews jealous, to try to get them to believe Jesus is their messiah thus putting the Jews on hold until the age of grace is finished. So now we are near the end of the Church Age(Age of Grace), 2000 year span, we are about to see the tribulation, which is for the Jews. The 2nd coming of Jesus at Armageddon to destroy Satan. Then the final year of Gods timeline(7000yrs) begins the 1000 year reign with Jesus Christ. Forgive me if I missed some details. Praise Jesus!
Respectfully it's obvious you are a dispensationalist. The doctrine you are summarizing came from Rev. John Nelson Darby along with the Scofield Reference Bible published around 1830. Prior to 1830 American Christians didn't believe in a secret rapture, It also taught that God stopped the prophetic clock at the 69th week. So we are living in the "gap" between the 69th and 70th weeks of Daniel which is now almost 2000 years. Dispensationalism is a man-made construct. May I suggest you focus on the covenants. You will get a clearer picture of what the Bible says. BTW research who funded the Scofield Reference Bible.....you will find it was a Jewish group in NYC. Now why would a Jewish group fund a Christians Reference Bible. The major doctrine that Scofield's dispensationalism introduced to Christians was the idea that God will deal with the "church" differently than "national Israel" in the "end times". Obviously Scofield (the criminal) never bothered to read Romans or Galatians. Praise Jesus!
And so is every other eschatological framework.
I disagree!
Shocking.
This is patently false.
While classical dispensationalism as formulated by theologians like C.I. Scofield and John Nelson Darby had its distinctive features, some of its elements can be traced to earlier theological traditions and interpretations of the Bible. Here are a few examples:
1.Distinction Between Israel and the Church:
• Early Church Fathers like Justin Martyr (2nd century) and Irenaeus (2nd century) acknowledged distinctions between God’s dealings with Israel and the Church in their writings. They recognized that God had specific plans for both groups.
2.Futurist Interpretation of Prophecy:
•The belief in future prophetic events can be traced to various interpretations of the Book of Revelation in early Christian writings. Some early Church theologians, like Hippolytus (3rd century), held views that anticipated future fulfillment of certain prophecies.
3.Premillennialism:
• The concept of a future literal thousand-year reign of Christ has been present in different forms throughout Christian history. Papias (1st century) is often cited as an early proponent of premillennialism, and it has appeared in the writings of various Church Fathers.
4.Rapture:
• While the term “rapture” was not used in the same way as in classical dispensationalism, early Christian writers such as Ephraem the Syrian (4th century) and Jerome (4th-5th century) discussed the idea of believers being caught up to meet Christ in connection with 1 Thessalonians 4:17.
While classical dispensationalism combined these elements into a systematic theological framework and popularized them in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it’s important to recognize that many of these ideas had antecedents in Christian thought and theology prior to the Scofield Study Bible. Dispensationalism itself has evolved over time, with variations and modifications to its original form.
You have a specific slant against the Scofield reference Bible and Darby that appears unfounded, for the same distinctions made in Modern Dispensationalism were drawn by very early believers in Christendom.
#RightlyDividingTheWord
Boy you got your talking points ready to go don't you? Dispensationalism supports the doctrine that God will treat the "church" different than "national Israel" in the "last days". The Scofield reference bible was funded by a group of "Jews" in NYC. Why would a Jewish group fund a Christian reference Bible?
All Jews aren’t bad, my man.
Hasty generalization much?
See? I can do short and punchy responses too !!
Praise Jesus! I’m not here to argue. The doctrine you think I am summarizing is from the bible, not a man. I merely paraphrased what is in the bible. I read the Bible and let the Word speak for itself. I have not said anything but what is in the bible. I follow what the word is saying. 2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” It’s ok to agree to disagree. HalleluJAH!
You need some serious sauce here, fren.
Just because you vehemently disagree with Dispensationalism doesn’t make Scofield a criminal. Sounds like your trying to run a smear campaign against Scofield and dispensationalism et al. Doesn’t look good. Instead of dealing with the individual claims of dispensationalism you prefer to sling mud at some of its main proponents. Got to be better than that.
Sauce? The sauce is all over the internet. Where's there's smoke there's fire. Of course these sources won't satisfy you will they? Because you are running a smear campaign against covenant theology. Doesn't look good fren! You got to be better than that.
https://willyealsogoaway.substack.com/p/the-shocking-truth-about-ci-scofield
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/scofield.htm
https://proliberty.com/observer/20090507.htm
https://www.gospeltruth.net/scofield.htm
https://whoisisrael.org/about-c-i-scofield/
I took the liberty of reading the first link you provided. I’ll give a detailed assessment for those who have the time to read this exchange but not willing to read all the inter webs links you shared. Let me know if you’d like me to assess your other links provided.
This link claims that Scofield was a dishonest and immoral man who abandoned his first wife and children, forged signatures, accepted bribes, lied about his credentials, and plagiarized his notes from other sources. It also claims that he was influenced by Zionists and occultists who wanted to promote a false doctrine of dispensationalism and Christian Zionism.
• My response: While it is true that Scofield had a troubled and controversial past, some of the accusations in the link are exaggerated or unsubstantiated. For example, there is no evidence that Scofield forged signatures or accepted bribes, and the claim that he plagiarized his notes from other sources is based on a faulty comparison of different editions of his Bible
Furthermore, there is no proof that Scofield was influenced by Zionists or occultists, and the claim that he was a member of a secret society called the Lotus Club is based on a misinterpretation of a newspaper article
Scofield's doctrine of dispensationalism and Christian Zionism was not a new or novel idea, but rather a development of the views of John Nelson Darby and other premillennialists who believed in the literal interpretation of biblical prophecy
• The author of this article claims that Scofield's Bible corrupted the word of God by adding his own notes and interpretations that contradicted the plain meaning of the text. It also claims that Scofield's Bible changed some words and verses to fit his dispensationalist agenda, such as replacing "day of Christ" with "day of the Lord" in 2 Thessalonians 2:2.
• My response: While it is true that Scofield's Bible added his own notes and interpretations, he did not claim that they were inspired or infallible, but rather offered them as a help for understanding the Scriptures. He also stated in his introduction that his notes were not intended to be a substitute for personal study or a commentary on every verse
Furthermore, he did not change the text of the King James Version, but rather used the marginal notes to indicate alternative readings or translations based on textual criticism or linguistic analysis
For example, he replaced "day of Christ" with "day of the Lord" in 2 Thessalonians 2:2 because he believed that the latter was more accurate and consistent with the context and other passages
I hope this helps those reading this to develop their own opinion about CI Scofield and his Bible.
Would you like me to assess the other links you provided?
The claim that a Jewish group in New York City funded the Scofield Reference Bible is a historical fact. The primary financial supporter of Cyrus Scofield's work on the Scofield Reference Bible was Samuel Untermeyer, a Jewish lawyer and philanthropist. It's important to understand the historical context and motivations behind this support:
Philanthropic Support: Samuel Untermeyer and other individuals provided financial support to various religious and educational causes. Their support was not limited to specific theological views but often aimed at promoting broader understanding and cooperation among different religious groups.
Interfaith Dialogue: The support for the Scofield Reference Bible should be seen in the context of interfaith efforts and a desire to promote religious literacy. This is consistent with other philanthropic activities that sought to bridge gaps between different religious communities.
Not Necessarily Endorsement: The financial support for the publication of the Scofield Reference Bible does not necessarily indicate an endorsement of its theological content. It's important to distinguish between supporting the publication of a work and wholeheartedly agreeing with its contents.
Theological Interpretation: The Scofield Reference Bible, while popular, represents a particular theological interpretation, namely dispensationalism. This interpretation is not universally accepted by all Christians, including those of Jewish faith, and thus, support for its publication does not imply a uniform theological perspective.
The financial support for the Scofield Reference Bible by individuals of Jewish faith should be understood within the broader context of philanthropic efforts and interfaith dialogue. It does not necessarily suggest a theological alignment with the content of the Bible but rather reflects a desire to engage in discussions and promote religious literacy across different communities.
No way you composed that this quick. You are either a bot or a paid shill. Get a life.
I’m well researched. Deal with it.
Respectfully, this makes no logical sense in the biblical narrative. All the Jews were never going to believe no matter what moment in history, only the remnant (the Christian Jews). Point 1: In the first century the Christian Gentiles were grafted in with the Christian Jews. The first century Christian Jews were the remnant, the true Israel, the true Jews of faith that Paul spoke of. All of the first century Jews who rejected Christ were no longer considered Jews, even though they were born of Jewish parents. This fulfilled the prophecy that "all Israel will be saved". All Israel was saved because only the Jews of faith were considered real Jews, not the Jews of the flesh. Point 2: The kingdom that Jesus established in the first century has no end. Point 3: The tribulation of the Jews was a first century event consisting of the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the Judean countryside circa A.D. 70.
So the Tribulation already happened?
Tribulation is always happening.
Jesus Christ teaches us to conquer as he has conquered.
https://communities.win/c/RevelationOfJesusChrist/p/17rSV9v2mf/conquerors/c
Yes the "Tribulation" happened in AD 70 when the Roman Army, led by General Titus, laid siege on the city of Jerusalem. The city as well as the Holy Temple were destroyed, thus marking the end of the Old Covenant. Jesus prophesied in Matthew 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13 that the Temple would be destroyed - "not one stone would be left upon another". What you have to understand is that this "great tribulation" was God's judgement on apostate Israel. But dispensational teaching puts the "Great Tribulation" in our future.
Hello fellow preterist. I'm a recovering dispensationalist. I can see that you understand what Paul was saying in Romans. Everything you said above I agree with. I noticed that someone down-voted you. I used to teach that the nations of the world will be judged on how that threat the nation of Israel. I got into preterism (I like to refer to it as covenant theology) about 15 years ago. Was having a discussion with a brother on whether the rapture was before or after the "Great Tribulation". I was pre-trib, he was post trib. While researching the pre-trib position I ran across an article that clamied that the "Great Tribulation" was in the past. I thought at the time "this is crazy". But the more I read/studied the more the position made sense & was heavily supported by scripture. Tell me what you think of this website: www.scripturerevealed.com