Searching the Q-drops (please correct me if I am wrong) I see no mention of Israel and 9/11 together at all.
I think, at this point, there is a high order of probability that Israel has been left to last in order to "show the people". Show the people what?
The last head of the Hydra, the Khazarian Mafia in Israel, which is intimately entwined with 9/11, as it thrashes around, trying desperately to maintain control of the narrative and situation.
We are watching in real time, as one of the primary forces behind 9/11, performs another such attack on it's own people in order to sway public attention/opinion, gain an unlimited mandate for war, and somehow stop the bankrupting of the Cabal by having money thrown hand over fist at them by the world community.
If the nation state of Israel, commandeered by the KM can be shown in real time to be actively engaged in such acts against it's own people, then it is a short journey for the normie mind to realizing this same entity, in conjunction with the US three letter agencies, was behind 9/11.
The similarities between this event and 9/11 are many and the IDF has gone from clueless to having a plethora of targeting coordinates in short order and onto a total war footing.
Then you have this Gem (drop 2337)
The question for me is "how much (control) has been exerted" and what percentage of the footage we are seeing is kabuki theatre ?
Edit:- Check out what is returned when you type the string (293476669283001) from drop 2337 into google books. It returns the phone book of Great Awakening topics.
https://www.google.com/search?q=293476669283001&tbm=bks&sca_esv=573410230
Note:- I do not use google for anything, except providing the above results.
Sauce? The sauce is all over the internet. Where's there's smoke there's fire. Of course these sources won't satisfy you will they? Because you are running a smear campaign against covenant theology. Doesn't look good fren! You got to be better than that.
https://willyealsogoaway.substack.com/p/the-shocking-truth-about-ci-scofield
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/scofield.htm
https://proliberty.com/observer/20090507.htm
https://www.gospeltruth.net/scofield.htm
https://whoisisrael.org/about-c-i-scofield/
I took the liberty of reading the first link you provided. I’ll give a detailed assessment for those who have the time to read this exchange but not willing to read all the inter webs links you shared. Let me know if you’d like me to assess your other links provided.
This link claims that Scofield was a dishonest and immoral man who abandoned his first wife and children, forged signatures, accepted bribes, lied about his credentials, and plagiarized his notes from other sources. It also claims that he was influenced by Zionists and occultists who wanted to promote a false doctrine of dispensationalism and Christian Zionism.
• My response: While it is true that Scofield had a troubled and controversial past, some of the accusations in the link are exaggerated or unsubstantiated. For example, there is no evidence that Scofield forged signatures or accepted bribes, and the claim that he plagiarized his notes from other sources is based on a faulty comparison of different editions of his Bible
Furthermore, there is no proof that Scofield was influenced by Zionists or occultists, and the claim that he was a member of a secret society called the Lotus Club is based on a misinterpretation of a newspaper article
Scofield's doctrine of dispensationalism and Christian Zionism was not a new or novel idea, but rather a development of the views of John Nelson Darby and other premillennialists who believed in the literal interpretation of biblical prophecy
• The author of this article claims that Scofield's Bible corrupted the word of God by adding his own notes and interpretations that contradicted the plain meaning of the text. It also claims that Scofield's Bible changed some words and verses to fit his dispensationalist agenda, such as replacing "day of Christ" with "day of the Lord" in 2 Thessalonians 2:2.
• My response: While it is true that Scofield's Bible added his own notes and interpretations, he did not claim that they were inspired or infallible, but rather offered them as a help for understanding the Scriptures. He also stated in his introduction that his notes were not intended to be a substitute for personal study or a commentary on every verse
Furthermore, he did not change the text of the King James Version, but rather used the marginal notes to indicate alternative readings or translations based on textual criticism or linguistic analysis
For example, he replaced "day of Christ" with "day of the Lord" in 2 Thessalonians 2:2 because he believed that the latter was more accurate and consistent with the context and other passages
I hope this helps those reading this to develop their own opinion about CI Scofield and his Bible.
Would you like me to assess the other links you provided?
Yes please do! I'm kinda busy preparing to teach my adult Sunday School class tomorrow.