The rising cost of living dominated campaigning with voters New Zealanders ending six years of Labour Party rule, the latter half of which was dominated by the country’s strict response to the coronavirus pandemic that successfully kept infections low but battered the economy.
With more than 98% of votes counted, the center-right National Party, led by former airline executive Christopher Luxon, had amassed around 40% of ballots, according to New Zealand’s Electoral Commission. A dejected Hipkins told supporters that Labour did not have enough votes to form a government.
“The result tonight is not one that any of us wanted,” he said, according to RNZ. “I gave it my all to turn the tide of history but alas, it was not enough.” Luxon said New Zealanders had “voted for change” and that his party would now get to work trying to form a coalition.“Tonight you have given us the mandate to take New Zealand forward,” he told supporters. Coalitions are the norm under New Zealand’s mixed-member proportional system, which was introduced in 1996.
The nationalist NZ First party and its leader Winston Peters could potentially become kingmaker in a coalition administration alongside the libertarian, right-wing Act Party. The only party to win a majority of votes and govern alone in the current political system was Labour in 2020, when Ardern won a landslide second term buoyed by her success at handling the country’s coronavirus outbreak. But Ardern announced her shock resignation in January, saying she no longer had enough fuel in the tank to contest an election, and passed the reins of her party on to Hipkins.
In NZ, another WEF puppet ushered in, so, no.
"Polling" leading up to elections are mass programming so no surprises as to how the WEF chosen one are installed.
Control the narrative and counter-narrative.
Serious question as I don't know a lot about WEF, and I'm always still learning new information from frens here. And I'm not referring specifically to NZ's politicians, but about all who have been to WEF.
Is there a chance that some of the good guys are sent to WEF so they will see and understand what WEF pushes/teaches/promotes, so that they can know what they are up against in their future in politics/business? So that they know their way of thinking/doing things, that they can fight against it in the future when the time is right. I mean the good guys had to have inside information to fight the bad guys right?
Like from one of q's posts about taking one for the team about Sessions...
https://qposts.online/post/3371
Yes, WEF doesn't automatically mean globalist puppet. Putin comes to mind as a counter example, but he's the only one I can think of.
Following up on this:
Bill Gates Lackey.
Sauce
Some people have reported the Twitter link broken. Here is a screenshot of the Twitter thread, no video obviously.