Thats why they are blabbing an anonymous source. Bunch of blah. Nothing here unfortunately that is already known except for additional clicks when her story fizzled out.
THERE is ONE thing that was NOT brought out: is the "SHADOW GOVERNMENT" made up of 300 individuals or individuals + governments???? I do believe that when President Trump took the "world tour" he was prepping certain government(s) of what was going to happen...and guess what: The look on the Pope's FACE after their meeting speaks volumes...just sayin'!!!!!
ChiefWoody2021...A VERY BIG THANK YOU FOR THIS...eye-opener is all I can say...
He said Space Force has the data/proof. Just because Jan Halper Hayes said Space Force has said the same thing, it doesn't mean she is the source of his information. Quite a few people might know that.
Being on almost any other program instead of Peters. After watching several of his "bombshells" I no longer will watch even 10 seconds of him. You guys may feel differently, but I don't believe anything he says.
Jane Halper Hayes is the source.
Glad to see you write this! So cringe to use her as a source. Its like using Charlie Ward. Instantly un-credible.
And then Stew Peters as well, like give me a break.
Thats why they are blabbing an anonymous source. Bunch of blah. Nothing here unfortunately that is already known except for additional clicks when her story fizzled out.
No kidding .. thank you !
THERE is ONE thing that was NOT brought out: is the "SHADOW GOVERNMENT" made up of 300 individuals or individuals + governments???? I do believe that when President Trump took the "world tour" he was prepping certain government(s) of what was going to happen...and guess what: The look on the Pope's FACE after their meeting speaks volumes...just sayin'!!!!!
ChiefWoody2021...A VERY BIG THANK YOU FOR THIS...eye-opener is all I can say...
She is not the source.
He said Space Force has the data/proof. Just because Jan Halper Hayes said Space Force has said the same thing, it doesn't mean she is the source of his information. Quite a few people might know that.
That said, she crossed my mind first!
So if the source is not Jan Halper, and is a completely different independant data point, would that give it more credence?
Being on almost any other program instead of Peters. After watching several of his "bombshells" I no longer will watch even 10 seconds of him. You guys may feel differently, but I don't believe anything he says.