Boy that tweet takes a lot of paragraphs and flowery syntax to say not much of anything at all.
Core message seems to be "Our collective goal is unity, so we MAGA patriots have to be way less divisive than we are!!"
In reality that isn't our "collective goal", because as individual human beings with individual identities and sovereign human rights, we don't have a "collective" goal.
We can't afford to let collectivism, a/k/a socialistic or communistic thought, push aside the commonly observed, provable fact that strong, responsible independent individuals form strong families, which form strong local communities, which lead to strong states, and strong nations controlled by the People. And there it ends: We have no drive within us to form a "strong world", as that necessarily entails one-world governance, an abomination upon the land that the People could no longer control. Strong nation-states automatically create the framework for world peace, as no one wants to attack a strong nation. It is weakness and vulnerability that invariably invite attack.
Divisiveness is a product not of the right, but of the divisive radical left wing, being the dividing dividers that they are, existing on division. Their side is divide and conquer: separate people into a large number of groups, and have them fight each other. Our side is unite and triumph: unify people regardless of "group identity", and make them proud to be patriots, one people under one glorious banner of freedom and individual rights.
No society stands on individualism alone. You can't have a society without a group, and you can't have a group without individuals. All must be respected, from top to bottom, as necessary to the continued existence of a functional society.
The problem is that the cabal wants only one collective or group to exist; theirs. And they want it to span the whole globe so no one can escape.
Instead, many different "collectives" can exist, all run by the individual constituents of each. And all strong and with a healthy respect of the sovereignty of each other. The highest level should be nation, not world.
Anything else is a misunderstanding of terms and of how a functional society works.
Those that stirring to action or dissent in GAW are most often exposed as Glowies in the end.
Be at peace u/Cqvfefe, If you don't believe her message, which IMO happens to agree with Q and Trump, and historical postings, then find evidence proving your point.
Flippantly just denying she could be right is canceling. That is not what we do.
Agreed. Whenever I see a wall of text, I have ChatGPT summarize it. Your one sentence is pretty much the same output from ChatGPT:
The message highlights intolerance for diverse opinions within the "Make America Great Again" community, stressing the importance of open dialogue and unity while noting potential psychological operations causing division.
intolerance for diverse opinions within the "Make America Great Again" community
Yes but "intolerance for diversity within the MAGA community" is a left-wing dog whistle, a rallying cry against the right. "Diversity" has never been demonstrated to be an overall positive thing anywhere; it is a destroyer of societies and cultures.
What "diversity" should we have more tolerance for that we don't? We tolerate one hell of a lot here IMHO.
Not being "tolerant" of doomers, Trump haters and naysayers, of Qphobes and larptards, of ignorance masquerading as virtue, etc., to me isn't a fault of this community; it's a core strength of it. Plenty of other websites exist for interacting with those folks.
ChatGPT is literally mindless and using it is a surrender of critical thinking.
Try learning to speed read. It is a rapid sorting talent you can develop if you allow your brain to be fully engaged while doing so. Don't be so willing to surrender your God-given abilities to AI.
Boy that tweet takes a lot of paragraphs and flowery syntax to say not much of anything at all.
Core message seems to be "Our collective goal is unity, so we MAGA patriots have to be way less divisive than we are!!"
In reality that isn't our "collective goal", because as individual human beings with individual identities and sovereign human rights, we don't have a "collective" goal.
We can't afford to let collectivism, a/k/a socialistic or communistic thought, push aside the commonly observed, provable fact that strong, responsible independent individuals form strong families, which form strong local communities, which lead to strong states, and strong nations controlled by the People. And there it ends: We have no drive within us to form a "strong world", as that necessarily entails one-world governance, an abomination upon the land that the People could no longer control. Strong nation-states automatically create the framework for world peace, as no one wants to attack a strong nation. It is weakness and vulnerability that invariably invite attack.
Divisiveness is a product not of the right, but of the divisive radical left wing, being the dividing dividers that they are, existing on division. Their side is divide and conquer: separate people into a large number of groups, and have them fight each other. Our side is unite and triumph: unify people regardless of "group identity", and make them proud to be patriots, one people under one glorious banner of freedom and individual rights.
Individuals form a collective.
No society stands on individualism alone. You can't have a society without a group, and you can't have a group without individuals. All must be respected, from top to bottom, as necessary to the continued existence of a functional society.
The problem is that the cabal wants only one collective or group to exist; theirs. And they want it to span the whole globe so no one can escape.
Instead, many different "collectives" can exist, all run by the individual constituents of each. And all strong and with a healthy respect of the sovereignty of each other. The highest level should be nation, not world.
Anything else is a misunderstanding of terms and of how a functional society works.
Those that stirring to action or dissent in GAW are most often exposed as Glowies in the end.
Be at peace u/Cqvfefe, If you don't believe her message, which IMO happens to agree with Q and Trump, and historical postings, then find evidence proving your point.
Flippantly just denying she could be right is canceling. That is not what we do.
Agreed. Whenever I see a wall of text, I have ChatGPT summarize it. Your one sentence is pretty much the same output from ChatGPT:
The message highlights intolerance for diverse opinions within the "Make America Great Again" community, stressing the importance of open dialogue and unity while noting potential psychological operations causing division.
Yes but "intolerance for diversity within the MAGA community" is a left-wing dog whistle, a rallying cry against the right. "Diversity" has never been demonstrated to be an overall positive thing anywhere; it is a destroyer of societies and cultures.
What "diversity" should we have more tolerance for that we don't? We tolerate one hell of a lot here IMHO.
Not being "tolerant" of doomers, Trump haters and naysayers, of Qphobes and larptards, of ignorance masquerading as virtue, etc., to me isn't a fault of this community; it's a core strength of it. Plenty of other websites exist for interacting with those folks.
What is ChatGPT?
This is actually accurate to what she was saying.
ChatGPT is literally mindless and using it is a surrender of critical thinking.
Try learning to speed read. It is a rapid sorting talent you can develop if you allow your brain to be fully engaged while doing so. Don't be so willing to surrender your God-given abilities to AI.
I use software to speed up tasks. How about you? Do you use a computer? Lol