Free speech is not absolute. It doesn't mean that we are free to say anything we want, wherever we want, or whenever we want.
For instance, child pornography, inciting violence, harassment, libel, and slander are all things that are not allowed under free speech.
Gag orders from courts have continually been upheld by the Supreme Court. They do not infringe on freedom of speech, as a whole. Although, they are considered in a case-by-case scenario. Trump could take his case to court if he feels that it infringes on his freedom of speech.
I don't equate child pornography to free speech. But people who are in favor of it certainly do.
Did you not understand that I'm against that?
Because I thought it was quite clear when I said that we should be grateful that free speech isn't absolute, otherwise child pornography would be legal.
Or are you making a distinction concerning the term "speech" in "free speech"?
Because "freedom of speech" is also "freedom of expression". It's not just about people actually speaking, as in talking (speech).
So freedom of speech also applies to film, photos, recordings, cartoons, texts, etc...
And the US Supreme Court is who decides on the legality of laws that are based on the US Constitution.
So, if he believes his gag order is unconstitutional, then he can certainly take his case on that as far as he can.
But gag orders themselves are not unconstitutional. He has to show HOW his gag order is unconstitutional. Just pointing to the US Constitution and offering his opinion on what the Founding Fathers meant by freedom of speech doesn't work.
And we should be glad that things don't work that way, because if they did, every pedophile could do the same and say laws against child pornography are unconstitutional because THEIR idea of what the First Amendment means says so.
Free speech people agree
Free speech is not absolute. It doesn't mean that we are free to say anything we want, wherever we want, or whenever we want.
For instance, child pornography, inciting violence, harassment, libel, and slander are all things that are not allowed under free speech.
Gag orders from courts have continually been upheld by the Supreme Court. They do not infringe on freedom of speech, as a whole. Although, they are considered in a case-by-case scenario. Trump could take his case to court if he feels that it infringes on his freedom of speech.
If you equate child pornography to speech, you speak a different language than me.
I don't equate child pornography to free speech. But people who are in favor of it certainly do.
Did you not understand that I'm against that?
Because I thought it was quite clear when I said that we should be grateful that free speech isn't absolute, otherwise child pornography would be legal.
Or are you making a distinction concerning the term "speech" in "free speech"?
Because "freedom of speech" is also "freedom of expression". It's not just about people actually speaking, as in talking (speech).
So freedom of speech also applies to film, photos, recordings, cartoons, texts, etc...
I did not say free speech. No where did I use the word FREE.
My original question still stands.
Depends on who you're governed by.
I won't be governed by corruption so for me I'll speak the truth.
Trump is the same, they're trying to silence him with a corrupt system.
Our constitution doesn't support that.
Well, we in the US are governed by our laws here.
And our laws are based on the US Constitution.
And the US Supreme Court is who decides on the legality of laws that are based on the US Constitution.
So, if he believes his gag order is unconstitutional, then he can certainly take his case on that as far as he can.
But gag orders themselves are not unconstitutional. He has to show HOW his gag order is unconstitutional. Just pointing to the US Constitution and offering his opinion on what the Founding Fathers meant by freedom of speech doesn't work.
And we should be glad that things don't work that way, because if they did, every pedophile could do the same and say laws against child pornography are unconstitutional because THEIR idea of what the First Amendment means says so.
You're governed by lawyers.
You have to take stand for truth
Be governed by truth.
https://communities.win/c/RevelationOfJesusChrist/p/17rSV9vK6A/144000-/c