And the US Supreme Court is who decides on the legality of laws that are based on the US Constitution.
So, if he believes his gag order is unconstitutional, then he can certainly take his case on that as far as he can.
But gag orders themselves are not unconstitutional. He has to show HOW his gag order is unconstitutional. Just pointing to the US Constitution and offering his opinion on what the Founding Fathers meant by freedom of speech doesn't work.
And we should be glad that things don't work that way, because if they did, every pedophile could do the same and say laws against child pornography are unconstitutional because THEIR idea of what the First Amendment means says so.
That sounds great until you land in prison. Or until that same philosophy is used against YOU somehow.
"Truth" is subjective. For instance, Muslims believe that their religion is the truth. Just the same as Christians do.
So if you advocate for people to be governed by their truths, then many Muslims would feel that they have the right to kill non-Muslims, based on their religion, which they believe to be the truth . So do you still believe we should be governed by what we think is truth?
You can't dictate to others what YOU feel is the truth is what THEY should live by.
We should be more concerned with FACTS than TRUTH.
Civil Disobedience and saying we all should be governed by our truths are two different things.
I'm not sure why you're even bringing up civil disobedience in this conversation.
Unless you're suggesting that President Trump should engage in civil disobedience and ignore his gag order? Because I'm not sure that would be seen as civil disobedience. But I'm not a constitutional scholar, and can't really say. Either way, I doubt it would go well for him if he did.
Again, advocating for civil disobedience is all great, until you land in prison.
I noticed you ignored my response to your earlier post. So, do you still suggest we all live by "truth" when that might also result in you being decapitated by Muslims who are living by THEIR truth?
Well, we in the US are governed by our laws here.
And our laws are based on the US Constitution.
And the US Supreme Court is who decides on the legality of laws that are based on the US Constitution.
So, if he believes his gag order is unconstitutional, then he can certainly take his case on that as far as he can.
But gag orders themselves are not unconstitutional. He has to show HOW his gag order is unconstitutional. Just pointing to the US Constitution and offering his opinion on what the Founding Fathers meant by freedom of speech doesn't work.
And we should be glad that things don't work that way, because if they did, every pedophile could do the same and say laws against child pornography are unconstitutional because THEIR idea of what the First Amendment means says so.
You're governed by lawyers.
You have to take stand for truth
Be governed by truth.
https://communities.win/c/RevelationOfJesusChrist/p/17rSV9vK6A/144000-/c
That sounds great until you land in prison. Or until that same philosophy is used against YOU somehow.
"Truth" is subjective. For instance, Muslims believe that their religion is the truth. Just the same as Christians do.
So if you advocate for people to be governed by their truths, then many Muslims would feel that they have the right to kill non-Muslims, based on their religion, which they believe to be the truth . So do you still believe we should be governed by what we think is truth?
You can't dictate to others what YOU feel is the truth is what THEY should live by.
We should be more concerned with FACTS than TRUTH.
Civil Disobedience is part of the culture of the USA.
stand on truth, be governed by truth.
Civil Disobedience and saying we all should be governed by our truths are two different things.
I'm not sure why you're even bringing up civil disobedience in this conversation.
Unless you're suggesting that President Trump should engage in civil disobedience and ignore his gag order? Because I'm not sure that would be seen as civil disobedience. But I'm not a constitutional scholar, and can't really say. Either way, I doubt it would go well for him if he did.
Again, advocating for civil disobedience is all great, until you land in prison.
I noticed you ignored my response to your earlier post. So, do you still suggest we all live by "truth" when that might also result in you being decapitated by Muslims who are living by THEIR truth?