What difference does it matter to introduce things legally, if the law doesn't need to be followed?
You keep changing your argument.
Should we all live by our truths, or should we live by the laws of society?
You can't have both.
There's a difference between protesting, such as with civil disobedience and saying that our legal system should be ignored in favor of everyone living by their truths.
I don't think you really even understand yourself, what it is you believe. You just flip-flop around on the matters involved.
We're getting to that place where I ignore your post except for your first premise.
You can and should to both practices:
1: Introduce evidence according to the established system.
2: stand up to the corrupt system.
We're going to do both.
We might get in some trouble, but that is to be expected. The corrupt system does not just fall down, it's a war.
I did ignore the rest of that post.
:)
Of course you did, because you had no answer.
What difference does it matter to introduce things legally, if the law doesn't need to be followed?
You keep changing your argument.
Should we all live by our truths, or should we live by the laws of society?
You can't have both.
There's a difference between protesting, such as with civil disobedience and saying that our legal system should be ignored in favor of everyone living by their truths.
I don't think you really even understand yourself, what it is you believe. You just flip-flop around on the matters involved.