I'm not saying you are right or wrong on Jim. Just remember this is coming from Axios - a very liberal organization founded by people from the Washington Post and Politico.
The article doesn't name the supposed 4 reps that claimed Jim will bring funding forward for a vote. It tried to obfuscate by bringing up Gaetz and MTG. They based the article on 4 unnamed sources - the same thing WaPo and Politico are famous for doing. Until I hear names or see him bring a vote forward I will take anything Axios says with a grain of salt.
[youweresupposedtodestroythedarksidenotjointhem.jpg]
But remember, we are supposed to just vote and support just because he's a Republican.
It's turning out I am once again correct about Jordan, neato.
I'm not saying you are right or wrong on Jim. Just remember this is coming from Axios - a very liberal organization founded by people from the Washington Post and Politico.
The article doesn't name the supposed 4 reps that claimed Jim will bring funding forward for a vote. It tried to obfuscate by bringing up Gaetz and MTG. They based the article on 4 unnamed sources - the same thing WaPo and Politico are famous for doing. Until I hear names or see him bring a vote forward I will take anything Axios says with a grain of salt.
This would mean more if he hadn't talked about funding them himself.