You talk a lot about physics, but you fail to demonstrate understanding of the subject. A 767 weighing about 175 tons, traveling at 440 mph, hitting an office building would cause immense damage from momentum alone, even if it consisted only of water. The major structures inside aircraft (wing spars and deck beams) are I-beams made of aluminum. They are tough cookies, and what happened had no relationship to tossing a beer can at a cement wall. In the event, the curtain walls and interior columns of the Twin Towers did not simply turn into dust upon the collision. So, your account doesn't even begin to accurately describe what happened.
I will leave it at that, because apparently it is unpopular to strip away the bogus authority claimed by people who don't really know.
Good work. That pretty much seals the deal. Anyone else saying otherwise is a spinster of truth. Two towers being hit allegedly by airplanes and collapsing into their own footprint is statistically impossible.
Doesn't affect what I said. The curtain walls of the Twin Towers would have posed no impediment (they are called "curtain walls" because they are not essentially structural; they are there to hold up the exterior covering). They were thin and mostly glass. The rest of the tower was open space between steel support columns. Read up on the 1945 collision of a B-25 bomber with the Empire State Building. It's not like these things haven't happened before.
But it does show that a very high speed collision can obliterate an airplane into small fragments.
9/11/01
9.11
{audio transmission}
What is a plane?
What is an I-beam?
What’s a plane made of? Aluminum.
What’s an I-beam made of? Steel.
How thick is airplane aluminum?
How thick is skyscraper steel?
What happens when you throw an aluminum can at a cement wall?
Does the entire cement wall explode into dust, and collapse?
9.11 was obviously not what the news said it was.
Barely any aspect of the official narrative stands up to scrutiny.
How was everyone suddenly blinded to the standard laws of physics they had understood for their entire lives.
Emotional trauma.
Herein lies the most remarkable facet of the crime.
What the world witnessed that day was closer to Hollywood than reality,
Scripted in such a way to be more fantastic than real life, but not fully plausible.
Seeing how many holes there are in the story,
The bigger question is why so few could see the obvious at first.
How many years did they have you fooled?
Some people can never admit they were fooled about anything.
Know-it-Alls.
What use is there in crying over spilt milk?
Why not turn 9.11 into a memorial holiday celebrating the long awaited revelation of the Truth.
“We’ve solved the greatest crime in history!
We’ve brought those who perpetrated it to justice!
Corrected the course they attempted set the world on.”
It has already happened.
All that’s left is for it to be known…
By the sheeple.
ΓQ
“9.11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB”
Have you heard this phrase before?
Did you understand what it meant?
Does this convey accurately what is most pertinent to know about the event that occurred that day.
How can Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth be dismissed by anyone who claims to be a journalist.
If 9.11 was the pin in the grenade that sent the NWO into hyperdrive,
Will a mass awakening to the truth of 9.11 be what ends the Age of Darkness.
When people understand of physics of what happened on 9.11,
Will humanity enter a new paradigm of energy and technology?
ΓQ
Alchemy can turn a stone into gold.
How do you turn a tower into dust?
Did the towers fall? Or did they disappear.
What percentage fell? What percentage disappeared?
What percentage was left in a smoldering pit of molten lava?
“Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams…”
but debunkers will say it can weaken them.
How is jet fuel going to turn an office building into a foundry?
[Hot Spots]
ΓQ
What is the strangest component of 9.11?
The 9.11 rabbit hole has no end.
It doesn’t only lead to a new understanding of geopolitics and war profiteering.
Further down, you face physics that look like magic to the average man.
You face a loosh harvesting mega-ritual, and the biggest MK-Ultra experiment in history.
Trauma based mind control.
You can’t deny it works!
ΓQ
https://deepstatemappingproject.weebly.com/orit-b-codex.html
Judy Wood on 9-11: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaWyiozg
You talk a lot about physics, but you fail to demonstrate understanding of the subject. A 767 weighing about 175 tons, traveling at 440 mph, hitting an office building would cause immense damage from momentum alone, even if it consisted only of water. The major structures inside aircraft (wing spars and deck beams) are I-beams made of aluminum. They are tough cookies, and what happened had no relationship to tossing a beer can at a cement wall. In the event, the curtain walls and interior columns of the Twin Towers did not simply turn into dust upon the collision. So, your account doesn't even begin to accurately describe what happened.
I will leave it at that, because apparently it is unpopular to strip away the bogus authority claimed by people who don't really know.
I will leave you this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4CX-9lkRMQ
Good work. That pretty much seals the deal. Anyone else saying otherwise is a spinster of truth. Two towers being hit allegedly by airplanes and collapsing into their own footprint is statistically impossible.
Doesn't affect what I said. The curtain walls of the Twin Towers would have posed no impediment (they are called "curtain walls" because they are not essentially structural; they are there to hold up the exterior covering). They were thin and mostly glass. The rest of the tower was open space between steel support columns. Read up on the 1945 collision of a B-25 bomber with the Empire State Building. It's not like these things haven't happened before.
But it does show that a very high speed collision can obliterate an airplane into small fragments.