My Frens,
You might think I’m crazy, and that doesn’t mean I’m not, but I’m going to discuss this theory.
It’s POSSIBLE that the “open border” here in the US is a good thing and part of the plan by the “good guys.”
OK, put down your sticks and stones and hear me out.
Let’s just think about this. How difficult would it be to apprehend terrorists and “bad guys” if they would otherwise be running around the world? Well, that would take a lot or resources and time; bottom line, it would be nearly impossible. Also, it’s probably hard, if not impossible, to prosecute them for terrorism. However, by opening up our border, it’s attracting these “bad guys’ and therefore much easier to apprehend them when they come to you. So, you say, that’s putting the US citizens in jeopardy. Well, where else on Earth are there as many guns and trained gun owners than here? There are (at last estimates) 400M guns and 72M gun owners here in the US. That’s a damn big army! So, does it sound like a great and easy way to apprehend terrorists? It’s pretty simple to charge them with immigration violations. I don’t care WHY they're in prison, just THAT they’re in prison.
This strategy would require some serious planning. Hmmm, sounds like a “plan.”
So, in a convoluted yet logical way, it’s POSSIBLE that the “open border” here in the US is a good thing and part of the plan by the “good guys.”
The Q team has said things like:
…and that paints a particular picture.
I think that it requires consideration and nuance, because it cannot be literally true in all circumstances with unlimited scope. If it were, we wouldn’t be in this situation.
So it must mean something less than that. What are they in control of? Its a great question and I don’t have a great answer. The best I have is, “enough”. Whatever it is, its enough to give them confidence in NCSWIC.
One other thing we need to keep in mind is, war is dirty and no one walks away unscathed. “NCSWIC” refers to the war and the will of God, but individual battles? Our anons come up with great theories to explain many situations, and I believe they are often right. There is one theory we never discuss though. That we simply lost a battle here and there. Black hats are not incompetent and white hats are still human. So its possible, likely really, that there were setbacks. The white hats would have anticipated some losses and I guarantee that every strategic goal had layers of contingency plans.
Just some pragmatic thought with your covfefe this morning. 🐸☕️
Upvoted because I've discussed it numerous times:
Original Plan was for Trump to win, the fraud to be exposed, the traitors arrested, and Trump to be inaugurated;
J6 protetsts would have been the OTHER side, who would have actually BEEN armed and violent;
who would not have peacefully and patriotically respected the velvet ropes;
who would have left the Capitol looking like the chimpanzee enclosure at the local zoo;
and yet would have been made out as heroes and champions of democracy and free speech by the deepstate-controlled media.
That Original Plan was derailed by some sort of threat to innocent lives
So we're in some advanced stage of the contingency Plans, which all secret military operations have set up from the outset for just such an occurrence...even the backup plans have backup plans
I find it impossible not to believe they've gamed this out to the nth degree, including plans for unexpected moves of stunning cunning from the other side. Q said they're stupid but I think he meant in a different way; they are very clearly brilliant geniuses in many areas, especially consensus building and psychological manipulation of the masses.
This is the one that no one ever considers. Our entire nation is being held hostage by the Swamp, who would not hesitate to severely damage a major city in some way if the White Hats go too far.
Never, ever forget this. Then it all makes sense.